AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Sterling Harwood

PHIL060 · PHIL60LOGIC · PHILOSOPHY · PHIL65 · PHIL60 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a quirky easy philosophy elective and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterEccentric StylePolarizing LecturesEasy ContentVague GradingConspiracy Tangents
  • Students split hard between loving his unique humor and .
  • Course content is generally easy with many quizzes and a term paper, but .
  • Recent reviews raise serious concerns about professionalism, vague teaching, and off-topic stories.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students call quizzes insanely easy and say an A is realistic with light effort, though .

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students repeatedly describe the class as easy, with light intellectual challenge beyond opinion writing and basic quizzes.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as mandatory and sometimes not, with little consistent enforcement detail across reviews.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; fans love the unique style while critics say they learned nothing and advise avoiding him.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Older reviews imply easy grades, but tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Expect and final, not an overwhelming daily grind.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some call him witty and engaging, while others say lectures are nonsense, vague, and poorly prepared.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

, and a major term paper with limited class prep for writing.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person students describe an eccentric, often entertaining lecturer whose class is usually easy but , and sometimes unprofessional.

Main concern

, and off-topic or inappropriate lecture content.

What students said

“Learned nothing about philosophy. Everything was extremely vauge.”
PHIL060
“Quizzes and . guaranteed A!”
PHIL60LOGIC
“He is one of the most eccentric professors I've ever had.”
PHIL60

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment and term paper, with limited detail on open or closed book rules.

Frequent QuizzesTerm PaperFinal ExamTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final term paper with uneven prep support.

Frequent QuizzesTerm PaperFinal Exam
“16 25 question quizzes”
PHIL060
“Quizzes and . guaranteed A!”
PHIL60LOGIC

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Quizzes and . guaranteed A!”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2025, highlighting eccentricity, easiness, and polarizing quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“He does not know how to teach.”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“If you want ”

📈 Easy Grades

78/100

“Very easy class sugggest taking it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • unique style. never boring if you really listened
  • most eccentric professors I've ever had
  • Lectures were just 3 hours of nonsense, conspiracies, and nasty pervy stories

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Fairly easy class
  • Quizzes and . guaranteed A!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • Learned nothing about philosophy
  • little to no class-time preparation for the
  • Completely neurotic. Frustrating for students who like organization

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen mostly older in-person reviews show consistent easy-class themes but conflict sharply with one detailed 2025 negative review.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL609 reviews
PHIL0604 reviews
PHIL60LOGIC1 review
PHIL651 review
PHILOSOPHY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values