AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Michael Divinia

MATH71 · MATH013 · CALCULUSII · MATH13 · MATH061 · MATH61 · MATH062 · MATH22 · MATH73 · MATHMATH · MATH073 · MATH78 · 61FINITEMATH · MATH62 · MATHCAL3 · MARTH73 · MATH25 · FINITE61 · MATH72 · 63 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Only take him if and ; otherwise find another professor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of Online HomeworkPolarizing LecturesCaring but InconsistentTest HeavySelf-Teach Required
  • Heavy WebAssign-style online homework is the dominant complaint across decades of reviews.
  • and chill, others say he arrives late and barely teaches.
  • Grades are often recoverable via curves, , notes or computer on tests if you keep up with homework.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is reachable if you finish the and ride the curve, but it is not free.

; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty is average math load, but poor pacing and .

; no online reviews exist.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while others report it as optional or loosely enforced.

; no online reviews exist.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

and many students explicitly say find another professor for higher math.

; no online reviews exist.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Curves, , extended HW deadlines, and notes or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Nearly every review stresses .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

while the other half report lateness, off-topic talk, and little real instruction.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

: long online homework and uneven lecturing are constant, while curves, , and open notes on tests soften the grade path for self-motivated students.

Main concern

Crazy amounts of WebAssign homework plus inconsistent classroom teaching can leave weaker students behind.

What students said

“He assigned a crazy amount of .”
MATH22
“Michael is a great . .”
MATH25
“ take so long to do. Literally does nothing in class”
MATH62

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are often long but many sections allow notes or a computer, with .

Notes AllowedComputer AllowedLong TestsCurve

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are frequently described as .

Notes AllowedComputer AllowedLong TestsCurve
“He lets you use computer during the tests, quizzes.”
MARTH73
“he lets you use computer and notes while .”
MATH73

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! He does not explain things and gives you many online homework .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2025, highlighting homework load and polarized teaching. Credibility rating: High.

📚

22/100

“He assigned a crazy amount of .”

🎯 Teaching Split

55/100

“Michael is a great . .”

⚠️

35/100

“I do not recommend taking professor Divinia for Math 62 or any higher math.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • . He is not that strict with anything.
  • Literally does nothing in class, he always comes late... never teaches.
  • He solves most of the problems in the board in his head

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If .
  • He gave extra credits and extended the due date for hw several times.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • crazy amount of
  • HUGE amounts of :50 problems per week

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

63

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty in-person reviews spanning 2005-2025 with and teaching-polar themes give strong signal.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 530
4 out of 57
3 out of 59
2 out of 511
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH738 reviews
MATH627 reviews
MATH0614 reviews
MATH0734 reviews
MATH134 reviews
Show 14 more courses
MATH614 reviews
MATH713 reviews
MATH723 reviews
MARTH732 reviews
MATH252 reviews
61FINITEMATH1 review
CALCULUSII1 review
FINITE611 review
MATH0131 review
MATH0621 review
MATH221 review
MATH781 review
MATHCAL31 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2