AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Chris Frazier

MATH · MATH72 · MATH063 · MATH010 · MATH25 · MATH71 · STAT63 · CALC1 · MATH63 · MATH62 · STATISTICS · CALC1MATH71 · MATH60 · MAT63 · MATH021 · MATH21 · MATH072 · 101 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
52.17%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can self-study math and filter long off-topic lectures; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProRambles Off TopicSelf-Teach RequiredNice Guy PolarizingWebAssign HeavyGroup Tests Sometimes
  • Students often like him personally but many say lectures wander and you must teach yourself.
  • , and effort can save the grade even when lectures confuse.
  • Opinion and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

, and homework completion help, but and many struggle.

Both formats reward effort and practice tests; neither is a free A for weak self-studiers.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Average difficulty is elevated and many .

Online and to land.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and optional in others with no single consistent policy.

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; strong fans exist, but .

Polarization appears in both formats, with slightly more .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, and note cards help, yet tough or inconsistent test grading appears too.

Format shift

but late returns; and sporadic partial credit.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and reading are expected; not always overwhelming but constant.

Format shift

; online adds hybrid self-pace pressure.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Personality praise is common, but clarity, organization, and on-topic lecturing are frequent failures.

Format shift

In-person has more extreme highs and lows; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

Tests and buffers.

Format shift

; practice exams are key.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some call him funny, caring, and life-changing; many , and .

Main concern

Off-topic rambling and lectures that do not prepare students for tests.

What students said

“ ”
MATH063
“Hard to understand the concepts when he constantly rambles off-topic.”
MATH063
“Worst math teacher ever. He rambles most of the class about non precalc subjects”
MATH021

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online and hybrid reviews note self-teaching, delayed grading, WebAssign alignment issues, and mixed personal praise.

Main concern

Late graded work and , and tests.

What students said

“he returned graded material extremely late. Like a month or more later.”
MATH71
“The textbook and ”
MAT63
“One of the I really appreciate his class”
CALC1MATH71

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

some open-book or group tests, but and study guides.

Practice TestsGroup Tests SometimesOpen Book SometimesNote CardsWebAssign Prep

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

open book at times, but predictability is a frequent complaint.

Practice TestsGroup FinalsOpen Book SometimesNote Cards
“ and let you use notes for tests.”
MATH71
“He does hand out practice tests for each Ch, which never resembles hw or lecture either, but memorize them.”
MAT63
“ .”
MATH63

Online

Online comments emphasize WebAssign prep, sample-test mismatch, and .

WebAssignSample TestsSlow Grading
“ .”
MATH71
“he was a .”
MATH71

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're already good at math then he's the professor for you, but if you're the structured math class like me, then run!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and in-person math , and polarized outcomes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

40/100

“He's always rambling! When he does lecture about the .”

📚 Self-Teaching Reality

35/100

“Be ready to self teach yourself the subject, his lectures don't help and neither does he.”

❤️ Personality vs Pedagogy

55/100

“He's not a bad guy, he's just a horrible teacher”

👍 Polarized Recommendation

50/100

“Don't let these negative comments scare you off.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He rambles. A LOT.
  • His lectures are useless
  • His method of teaching was paced and he made every effort to give individual attention

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do the homework and and you'll at least get a C.
  • and

Theme 3

⚠️ About Who Should Enroll

  • .
  • if you struggle w/ math/school.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

101

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years create a large sample; polarization is consistent enough to trust the split-profile conclusion.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 517
3 out of 59
2 out of 520
1 out of 530

Course coverage

MATH6311 reviews
MATH719 reviews
MAT637 reviews
MATH0637 reviews
CALC1MATH712 reviews
Show 12 more courses
MATH722 reviews
STATISTICS2 reviews
CALC11 review
MATH1 review
MATH0101 review
MATH0211 review
MATH0721 review
MATH211 review
MATH251 review
MATH601 review
MATH621 review
STAT631 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 3

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 5

C range

4

C+ 2 · C- 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1