AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Shiva Singh

ENGR003 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a chill engineering intro with and an easy A path, but expect memorization and uneven teaching value.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyExtra credit availableChill and friendlyMemorization-heavy testsOutdated textbookMixed lecture quality
  • Most students find him cheerful and and .
  • Content is plain and .
  • and one harsh review urges avoiding the class for and no Canvas use.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students report A and A+ grades with , and and memorization.

All evidence is from in-person ENGR-003 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is described as plain and low-value intellectually, with difficulty ratings mostly low to moderate.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory for this class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Three of four would take again and , but and weak learning.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and ; reported grades are A/A+ despite mixed teaching quality.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Light

75/100

; main load is reading an outdated textbook and memorizing for tests.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and plain content with rude moments and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

; little deep project or assignment weight is described.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person ENGR-003 is mixed: many praise his cheerful, helpful style while , and .

Main concern

, and occasional disorganization or .

What students said

“I encourage everyone to take his class, it will be amazing.”
ENGR-003
“ if possible.”
ENGR-003
“the .”
ENGR-003

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and can feel pure recall rather than application.

Memorization testsIn-person examsProfessor interruptions during tests

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; one student said the professor frequently interrupted class during tests.

Memorization heavyIn-person testsOutdated textbook
“the .”
ENGR-003
“Professor would frequently interrupt class during tests.”
ENGR-003

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I loved Mr. Singh's class. He always had the class in a good mood and and respectful.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting mixed teaching praise versus memorization and organization complaints. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Despite his claims, he can be rude at times, but it was never anything serious. Unfortunately, you hardly learn much of actual value, as the content is plain.”

👍 Recommendation Split

70/100

“I encourage everyone to take his class, it will be amazing.”

📚 Memorization Tests

45/100

“the .”

⚠️

25/100

“ if possible.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is very cheerful and very friendly.
  • He always had the class in a good mood and and respectful.
  • Lecturers lacked a directive.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Friction

  • Outdated textbook that required memorization.
  • .
  • Professor would not use CANVAS or online sources in any way.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

and limited detail reduce confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGR-0034 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1