Antonio Perez

CNSTR101B · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 24/100
RMP rating: 1.9/5
Take again: 21.05%
Difficulty: 2.8

The decision

Avoid if you need reliable instruction; only consider if and tolerate chaos.

Best fit · Self Taught ProQuits Mid-SemesterDisorganized LecturesTime-Wasting RantsHarsh AttitudeUnreliable Online

Frequently abandons courses mid-term, leaving students without guidance for weeks.
and chaos instead of structured skill teaching.
A few students praise hands-on labs and industry toughness, but most call him a waste of tuition.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Many students report A or A+ grades, but others got F or and mid-course chaos.

Online reviews show several A grades despite low teaching quality; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

58/100

Content is introductory construction tech, but poor organization and vague instructions make simple projects feel harder than they are.

Online is mostly reading and disengaging busywork; hard theory.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

being dropped for being one minute late on day one.

Both formats flag mandatory attendance; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Roughly one in ; most urge picking another professor due to unreliability and wasted time.

Positive recommendations cluster in ; recent online and in-person reviews strongly advise against him.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

and graded-by-few-things tags appear often, with early submissions docked and .

Format shift

; online grades include A despite weak instruction.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload swings from light boring reading to lots of homework and .

Format shift

; and unfinished projects.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant theme is disorganization, abandonment, rants, and little skill transfer, with only a minority praising hands-on passion.

Format shift

Online is especially unresponsive; reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and few high-stakes items rather than a clear exam-driven structure.

Format shift

; most online and in-person comments stress assignments and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Hands-on construction labs can teach real skills when focused, but many students describe disorganization, , and .

Main concern

Wasted class time, chaotic labs, and risk of mid-semester disruption or harsh treatment.

What students said

“This teacher is horrible never ever let this teacher teach he quits mid way messing with my classes.”
CNSTR101B

“Wastes half the beginning of class ranting. Then wastes the second half of class ordering students around without explaining what/how/why.”
CNSTR101B

“He prepared interesting hand-on practices to learn and have fun at the same time.”
CNSTR101B

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are boring textbook slogs or AI-summary lectures with unresponsive support; multiple reports of the instructor dropping the course mid-term.

Main concern

Instructor abandonment and .

What students said

“This instructor dropped the course halfway through the term and was often unresponsive and unreliable while teaching.”
CNSTR101B

“He even dropped the courses halfway through leaving no assignments for 6 weeks. His lectures are AI summaries with no real guidance.”
CNSTR101B

“It was all online and easy to do but pretty boring. You read the entire textbook throughout the semester.”
CNSTR101B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are rarely described clearly; assessment and mid-course disruption than proctored tests.

Sparse grading criteriaProject and lab focusOccasional tests

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and labs with occasional test-heavy tags, not clear proctoring policies.

Hands-on projectsTest heavy (mentioned)Graded by few things

“ ”
CNSTR101B

“ weeks before the final.”
CNSTR101B

Online

Online reviews ; focus is readings, essays, and abandoned assignment schedules.

Reading-heavy workUnclear written assignments

“Perez expects essays like it's an english class. . His assignments and questions are poorly written.”
CNSTR101B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“This instructor dropped the course halfway through the term and was often unresponsive and unreliable while teaching.”
Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews spanning online and and teaching chaos. Credibility rating: High.

🚨 Reliability Collapse

22/100

“He even dropped the courses halfway through leaving no assignments for 6 weeks.”

👎 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ . We were supposed to frame a and by the end of the semester, we barely finished a pony wall.”

⚠️ Classroom Climate

30/100

“Perez is rude, bombastic, and bickers with other professors in the department- to the detriment of students.”

🛠️ Occasional Hands-On Praise

70/100

“He prepared interesting hand-on practices to learn and have fun at the same time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

His lectures are AI summaries with no real guidance
Instead,he does emotional rants
Bumbling and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

if you just need a grade
did it early

Theme 3

💔 About Reliability

he quits mid way messing with my classes
dropped the course halfway through the term
leaving no assignments for 6 weeks

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

19 recent detailed reviews across online and and disorganization despite some positive outliers.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 51

1 out of 514

Course coverage

CNSTR101B19 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

B 4 · B- 1

C range

C 1

D range

No reported values

F

F 1

No letter grade reported

Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 3

Antonio Perez

Avoid if you need reliable instruction; only consider if x x x x x and tolerate chaos.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Beginner

Mandatory

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🚨 Reliability Collapse

👎 Teaching Quality

⚠️ Classroom Climate

🛠️ Occasional Hands-On Praise

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

💔 About Reliability

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

Avoid if you need reliable instruction; only consider if and tolerate chaos.