AI Rate Professor

Art

Ingrid Kothlow

ART060 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Be cautious for in-person ART060; the online version may be much more student-friendly if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProFormat-Dependent ExperienceStrict Unaccommodating RulesAwkward Classroom VibeExtra Credit OnlineParticipation Heavy
  • Recent in-person ART060 reviews are harshly negative about lectures, rules, and inspiration-killing vibe.
  • Older online review is highly positive with , and caring support.
  • Overall experience appears to depend heavily on course format and year.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Online student earned an A with , but in-person students reported B grades under strict pressure.

Online looks easier with ; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings span 2 to 5 and complaints focus more on vibe and rules than pure content hardness.

Online difficulty was low; in-person felt harder and more stressful.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

All three reviews mark attendance mandatory, including online Zoom sessions.

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

; only one older online review is enthusiastic.

Online review would take again; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Online helped; in-person tone feels strict and unaccommodating rather than generous.

Format shift

; in-person felt controlling.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

No textbook, Canvas modules, videos, and participation-heavy class .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize class .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Recent in-person students found lectures repetitive and demotivating, outweighing one strong older online praise.

Format shift

Online praise is high; in-person teaching experience is poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Participation, Canvas materials, and art-class work matter more than a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ART060 felt awkward, unaccommodating, and demotivating with repetitive lectures and strict rules.

Main concern

Students felt targeted, untrusted, and uninspired to make art.

What students said

“I couldn't stand listening to her lectures. She'd constantly repeat .”
ART060
“This professor was extremely unaccommodating. Students constantly felt targeted/uncared for.”
ART060

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online ART060 was enjoyable with , recorded Zoom meetings, and after-hours help.

Main concern

.

What students said

“She gave plenty of opportunities for . & if need be. Thankfully she records all of her zoom class meetings”
ART060

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe proctored exams; participation and class materials dominate assessment talk.

Participation mattersCanvas modulesRecorded Zoom classes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews focus on repetitive lectures and strict .

Participation mattersCanvas lecture replay
“Half the class was replaying videos that could be found in the modules.”
ART060

Online

Online review focuses on recorded Zoom meetings, , and help after hours rather than proctored tests.

Recorded Zoom meetingsExtra creditCanvas posts
“Thankfully she records all of her zoom class meetings in case you miss any as she .”
ART060

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor was extremely unaccommodating. Students constantly felt targeted/uncared for.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (1 online, 2 in person), highlighting a sharp format split. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️

20/100

“The class room environment was so unbelievably awkward. It didn't feel like a fun social art class”

💻 Online Silver Lining

85/100

“Outstanding teacher. She gave plenty of opportunities for .”

🎨 Inspiration Impact

25/100

“ever since I took her class I've been completely uninspired to make any art for myself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She'd constantly repeat .
  • Half the class was replaying videos that could be found in the modules.
  • Outstanding teacher.

Theme 2

📏 About Rules and Climate

  • extremely unaccommodating
  • random strict rules that made us grown adults feel like we weren't trusted
  • class room environment was so unbelievably awkward

Theme 3

💻 About Online Support

  • plenty of opportunities for
  • records all of her zoom class meetings

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews exist and they split sharply by format and year, so confidence in a single overall picture is limited.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART0603 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values