AI Rate Professor

English

Charles Heimler

ENG092 · ENG1A · ENGL1A · 86B · ENG001 · 1C · ENGLISH1C · ENGLISH1A · 1A · ENGLISH1B · ENG1B · ENG86A · ENGL84A · ENG92 · ENGL001C · ENG1C · 104 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
8.33%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid him for English composition unless you are fully self-taught and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderSo many papersVague instructionsNo useful feedbackGoogle it
  • Students overwhelmingly report vague instructions, no teaching, and .
  • Papers and drafts are graded harshly with little or .
  • ; a few older in-person positives do not offset the pattern.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

As, and comments that you will not get an A without extreme independent effort.

; online students stress this most.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content and volume of because and untaught.

Online and ; online is worse due to support.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

while several courses require participation texts or class presence to pass.

; as failing.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Near-floor would-take-again rate and .

Online ; a few older in-person reviews are more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students report strict Bs and Cs, harsh first-draft grades, and little .

Format shift

, especially online papers.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

So , and last-minute reading piles are constant complaints.

Format shift

Online and in-person both report heavy paper load; .

Teaching experience

Poor

20/100

Core complaint is he does not teach, refuses to clarify, and answers with Google it or another question.

Format shift

Online teaching quality is especially poor; rare in-person positives mention structure when students already work hard.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on many essays and revisions rather than traditional proctored exams.

Format shift

Both formats are paper-driven with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and arrogance, though a minority praise high standards and research methods.

Main concern

and grades not kept current.

What students said

“Me. Heimler does not give clear instructions on what he is looking for on papers.”
1A
“He doesnt give enough feedback to improve the works done, then when the and criticize half of the work done”
ENG1C
“Mr. Heimler is a very clear teacher. and often adds personal stories .”
ENG092

Remote format

Online

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online English sections are widely called the : vague prompts, late or , and condescending WhatsApp or email replies.

Main concern

Zero teaching support combined with and .

What students said

“Be careful in enrolling with this professor, he provides vague instructions left for you to interpret, grades very harshly on first drafts”
1A
“He gives you smart ass answers when asking for help or clarification." Read it and you tell me what it says", or "Google it".”
ENG1A
“Absolutely the . Forces students to text him for participation, doesn't have a and grades very unfairly.”
ENG1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Courses are paper-centric with tough draft grading; than proctoring software.

Many papersDrafts and revisionsPop quizzesResearch paperMinimal rubric clarity

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize piles of papers, last-minute articles, and .

Pop quizzesMany papersLast-minute readingsAttendance-linked work
“he will assign a bunch of things every class and will post articles a few hours before class”
ENG1A
“If you actually do the homework as assigned the " .”
ENG092

Online

Online evidence focuses on essays, vague midterms, and .

Essay heavyVague midterm topicsNo Lockdown mentionedRevision without feedback
“Why does he grade so harshly on a first draft? He gives me a ”
1A
“provided ”
ENGL001C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“STAY AWAY from this teacher. He is the . He does not teach you one single thing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews with strong consensus on poor support and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“What an awful teacher that puts no effort into his job. He hates teaching because he tells us to google everything”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“DO NOT TAKE HIM. No matter what choices you have, no matter if classes are filled and he's the last .”

📝

15/100

“You WILL NOT get an A in this class if . There is .”

📄 Workload

22/100

“ , and he would rarely give an A or B for your hard work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Any questions about technique are met with "Google it."
  • .
  • Did not teach a single thing.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • He grades very hard.
  • , and rude in .
  • I failed his course, after getting As and Bs, and a couple Cs.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support

  • Doesn't give feedback, tells and doesn't follow up on emails.
  • Forces students to text him for participation
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

104

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with strong negative consensus across years and formats make the pattern highly reliable despite a few outlier positives.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 511
3 out of 510
2 out of 514
1 out of 544

Course coverage

1A12 reviews
ENG1A6 reviews
ENG1C6 reviews
1C5 reviews
ENGL001C4 reviews
Show 11 more courses
86B3 reviews
ENG1B3 reviews
ENG0012 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
ENG0921 review
ENG86A1 review
ENG921 review
ENGL1A1 review
ENGL84A1 review
ENGLISH1B1 review
ENGLISH1C1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

7

B 6 · B- 1

C range

4

C 3 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

13

Drop/Withdrawal 8 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1