AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Monette Reyes

ECE105 · ECE103 · ECE109 · ECE102 · ECE104 · ECEALL · ECE147 · ECE107 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
16%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless she is your only ECE option and you , and group-dependent grades.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing ExamsLate or Missing GradesGroup Project HeavyUnclear InstructionsRude or Critical Tone
  • Recent reviews heavily warn of , and confusingly worded exams.
  • Group projects and mandatory participation dominate grades while feedback and .
  • A minority of older reviews praise hard preparation for teaching careers, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even hardworking students report delayed grades, group-controlled outcomes, and .

Online and and ; reported A outcomes are rare.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and high difficulty ratings make the experience intellectually and logistically demanding.

In-person comments carry most of the heavy-workload detail; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Skip-class warnings and required participation appear repeatedly, so .

and participation themes appear in both formats.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Would-take-again is about 16 percent and if any alternative exists.

Both online reviews say no; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Tough-grader tags, late grading, group-based scores, and and opaque.

Format shift

; online also reports end-of-term mystery grades.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of , and material costs create a heavy ongoing load.

Format shift

; online still piles group assignments and tests.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Many students report , and rude interactions, though a minority call her dedicated and career-focused.

Format shift

Online reviews criticize Zoom tangents; in-person reviews split but lean negative in recent years.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and a few high-stakes midterms or finals rather than steady transparent homework.

Format shift

Both formats mention few graded items with heavy project and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ECE reviews are mostly negative on clarity, organization, email responsiveness, and her demanding but career-preparing.

Main concern

, and harsh interpersonal tone drive most complaints.

What students said

“ and .”
ECE105
“She is the . if you can.”
ECE102
“If you really want to learn to become a ”
ECE109

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe unclear shifting expectations, , and lectures that wander with little actual teaching.

Main concern

You may not know your grade until the end and .

What students said

“doesnt grade until end of semester (you have to guess your grade)”
ECE107
“the tests won't have ANYTHING to do with her lectures. .”
ECE107

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

to class, and high-stakes rather than student-friendly.

Confusingly worded examsOpinion-based questionsTests not matching lecturesStudy guides sometimes provided

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals confusingly worded, riddle-like, or poorly aligned with notes and study guides.

Confusingly worded examsRiddle-like questionsTest heavyStudy guide sometimes given
“ and .”
ECE105
“mid term and and half of the questions were more opinion based than factual.”
ECEALL
“ so confusingly worded and are often not covered in class/the study guide.”
ECE102

Online

Online reviews say tests may ignore lecture content; .

Tests disconnected from lecturesFew graded items
“the lectures.”
ECE107
“1 project, 1 presentation, 2 tests, & 4 group assig”
ECE107

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if possible. The wording in the questions in the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews (2 online, 36 , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She is the . if you can.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ but her.”

📝

25/100

“ and .”

⏱️

22/100

“she doesn't grade your assignments till weeks after class course has ended.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She
  • rambles in lectures
  • She is a wonderful professor! She cares for your learning and requires you learn hard.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • getting an A is incredibly hard is not the main theme; late and
  • you will not receive your grade until after the course has ended
  • It is impossible to receive a good grade because you are

Theme 3

🧭 About Clarity and Organization

  • everything is a end
  • Requires you to submit assignments via Canvas messages instead of assignment pages.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-eight reviews across many years and ECE courses show a strong recent negative consensus on clarity and and consistency for high credibility.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 517

Course coverage

ECE1079 reviews
ECE1048 reviews
ECE1097 reviews
ECE1023 reviews
ECE1033 reviews
Show 3 more courses
ECE1053 reviews
ECEALL3 reviews
ECE1472 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 1