AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Stephanie Stepp

CHEM32A · CHEM12A · CHEM15 · CHEM1A · 110A · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Worth taking for CHEM1A if you attend, do ALEKS, and study lecture notes; expect fair but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringAmazing LecturesTough GraderExtra CreditLecture Heavy
  • , and helpful in CHEM1A lecture and lab.
  • Exams are solid but manageable with , and .
  • A vocal minority reports grading errors, slow feedback, or unhelpful teaching in higher courses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is reachable with ALEKS, practice tests, and , but exams stay tough and .

Online CHEM32A felt easy with lots of EC; in-person CHEM1A needs steady work for a high grade.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Chemistry material is inherently demanding, though labs and practice problems are described as clear.

Online intro reviews call it easy; and organic courses feel harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Most recent CHEM1A reviews list attendance as and lab success.

Nearly ; online notes mix mandatory and optional.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

About two-thirds would retake her, mainly citing kindness, engagement, and real help in lab.

Online reviews are glowing; in-person is mixed but still leans recommend for CHEM1A.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and and answer-key errors frustrate some students.

Format shift

Online felt generous with EC; .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

ALEKS, labs, quizzes, and but manageable pace.

Format shift

In-person CHEM1A carries most of the workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

Many praise engaging lectures and lab help; .

Format shift

Online CHEM32A is strongly positive; in-person quality depends heavily on the course.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and exams with some lowest scores dropped.

Format shift

In-person comments describe the mix most clearly; online emphasizes EC and support.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person CHEM1A feedback is mostly positive on care and lectures, with and older CHEM12A blowback.

Main concern

Answer-key mistakes, slow grade returns, and some courses where students felt set up to fail.

What students said

“She's a .”
CHEM1A
“ . She will have a wrong ”
CHEM1A
“Terrible lectures, barely teaches, and when she gives us study guides they never help”
CHEM12A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Both online CHEM32A reviews praise patience, , and GPA-friendly support.

Main concern

Very small sample limited to one intro course.

What students said

“SHES AN AMAZING CHEM TEACHER FOR 32A. SHE GIVES PLENTY OF .”
CHEM32A
“Highly reccomend.”
CHEM32A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are challenging but and .

Group Plus Multiple ChoicePractice TestsCurvesExam CorrectionsMulti-Chapter Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and multiple choice, with curves and .

Group Work PortionMultiple ChoiceCurvesCorrections Allowed
“ and multiple choice.”
CHEM1A
“ if majority do bad and allows for corrections.”
CHEM1A

Online

Online ; they emphasize and patient teaching.

Extra Credit Heavy
“SHE GIVES PLENTY OF . PATIENT AND VERY UNDERSTANIDNG FOR STUDENTS.”
CHEM32A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, balancing strong CHEM1A praise against harsh outlier complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Student Care

66/100

“she is actually so NICE!! The class itself is hard b/c of the material but She writes everything on the board”

👍 Recommendation Lean

64/100

“ :)”

⚖️

52/100

“ . She will have a wrong , forget to give you a formula”

🧪

58/100

“ if majority do bad and allows for corrections.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's creative and keeps class engaging
  • Practice problems during lecture.
  • Terrible lectures, barely teaches

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • ALEKS hw is a large portion of your grade and .
  • , but not unreasonable.
  • like to see kids fail

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is so nice.
  • SHE GIVES PLENTY OF . PATIENT AND VERY UNDERSTANIDNG
  • Shes the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews with recent CHEM1A detail help, but only two online reviews and a cluster of short negative CHEM12A posts limit confidence.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CHEM1A7 reviews
110A3 reviews
CHEM12A3 reviews
CHEM32A2 reviews
CHEM151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1