AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Viet Nguyen

MATH253 · MATH72 · MATH025 · MATH063 · MATH22 · MATH25 · MATH63 · MATH13 · MATH062 · MATH111 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take if you can handle a strong accent and will do weekly HW; avoid if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Grading CriteriaAccent BarrierLecture HeavyUnlimited HW TriesCurves Exams
  • and and rudeness
  • but content and pace can be hard
  • and lectures are heavy

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Unlimited HW tries and curves help, but and lots of .

Online grades can look easy via unlimited HW; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Average difficulty is high with , and concepts that many must relearn alone.

Both formats call content hard; online adds accent-comprehension friction.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Tags and and you will not pass; .

; in-person strongly pressures attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

Roughly mixed take-again and and math readiness.

; many older in-person reviews are positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, and retakeable HW balance tougher grader complaints.

Format shift

Online and in-person both mention clear criteria; .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and frequent tests add real time load.

Format shift

Both formats report lots of homework and lecture volume.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

and caring moments for some; accent, speed, and cold responses frustrate others.

Format shift

In-person has more balanced praise; recent online reviews are more negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework often about 30% with multiple midterms and a final; study guides track tests closely.

Format shift

Online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person math is lecture-heavy with , and curves; quality varies by student fit with accent and pace.

Main concern

Skip class and you fall behind; if you struggle.

What students said

“I appreciate the fact that he gives us unlimited chances on our homework but the .”
MATH063
“ if you really want to understand math. You'll learn how to be a robot.”
MATH063
“ ! Honestly taking math precalc + trig in one class on summer is tough.”
MATH25

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one praises caring teaching, others report boredom, accent issues, and .

Main concern

Accent and perceived rudeness hurt online or async understanding.

What students said

“His lectures are boring and he has a thick accent, but .”
MATH025
“ if you have a choice.”
MATH253
“He makes math easy to understand and I'm excited to show up for his class everyday.”
MATH111

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are standard difficulty with study guides, limited notes, and .

Study guidesNote sheets allowedCurved examsMultiple midterms

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

guides, and often get curved; not open-book.

1-2 note sheetsStudy guide matches testsCurves on midterms and final
“He does allow 1 sheet of and 2 sheets on the final.”
MATH063
“ and exams.”
MATH063
“Know the study guide for tests! They are almost the same!”
MATH025

Online

Online reviews mention midterms and a ; .

3 midterms and finalWeekly HW unlimited tries
“There were 4 lectures a week, weekly homework assignments (20 questions and unlimited tries!), 3 midterms, and 1 final.”
MATH025

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Despite his accent hes pretty easy to understand. I appreciate the fact that he gives us unlimited chances on our homework but the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews across online and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

62/100

“His lectures are challenging but color coded, neatly written out, and very thorough.”

⚖️

55/100

“ and exams.”

⚠️ Polarizing Fit

40/100

“ if you have a choice.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • color coded, neatly written out, and very thorough
  • he has an accent but easy to understand
  • I could not understand a lick of what he was saying

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

Theme 3

🚪

  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • need to attend class and do HW
  • Do NOT miss class you'll lose lots of material

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews spanning 2010-2024 with and teaching notes and consistent themes across years.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH0636 reviews
MATH133 reviews
MATH0252 reviews
MATH1112 reviews
MATH632 reviews
Show 6 more courses
1111 review
MATH0621 review
MATH221 review
MATH251 review
MATH2531 review
MATH721 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 6

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1