AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Allan Wilcox

CHEM001A · CHEM001B · CHEM1A · CHEM1B · CHEM001 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you will attend, study hard, and use office hours; expect a fair but not easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and approachableTough on lab reportsExtra credit on examsClear practice problemsGrading mistakes happen
  • Most students say and wants you to succeed if you put in work.
  • Lab reports and ; always double-check scores for mistakes.
  • and participation matters; homework and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

As are common with , and lab work, but he is a tough grader and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

General chemistry content is demanding with fast lectures, reading, and problem sets that require regular study.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and tags warn that skipping class hurts your grade.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

73/100

and caring support when you put in the work.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

and clear criteria help, but tough lab reports and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Expect lots of , and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

75/100

and interactive, though some report mistakes, mumbling, or unprepared labs.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grade mixes homework, lab reports, quizzes, midterms, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person Chem 1A/1B with , and exams; many praise clarity and care, while a minority report grading errors and harsh labs.

Main concern

and occasional exam scoring mistakes require careful score checks.

What students said

“He is my favorite teacher I have ever had during my community college career.”
CHEM1B
“worst professor I have had. ”
CHEM001B
“ and checks to see if you understand by having you work examples in class.”
CHEM1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and and practice tests; reviews do not clearly prove open-book or special proctoring.

In-class quizzesPractice examsExam and quiz focusNo clear open-book policy

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams with practice exams close to real tests; students report tough difficulty and .

Practice examsIn-person examsPop quizzesTough scoring
“He even gives practice exams that so you know what to focus on.”
CHEM1A
“ if the average was a 50%.”
CHEM001B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The grade that you get reflects the effort that you put into the course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching care, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

75/100

“ . He cares about students learning.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

73/100

“ .”

⚖️

42/100

“he is a though .”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“Even though the time, it will definitely work in your benefit.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are pretty fun and he is good at explaining the subject
  • during class
  • he is always willing to help any students during his office hours

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Chem 1B is a difficult course in general
  • He is a but tells what is needed for a
  • gives (a great amount of) on the exams

Theme 3

⚠️ About Frustrations

  • always messes up with grading! Please always check ur answers
  • Treats college students as if they were kids

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

22 detailed in-person reviews span 2017-2023 with consistent themes on care, workload, and .

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CHEM1A11 reviews
CHEM1B6 reviews
CHEM001A2 reviews
CHEM001B2 reviews
CHEM0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

7

B+ 1 · B 6

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values