AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Daniel Torres

ACCTG062 · ACCTG021 · ACCTG101 · ACCT21 · ACCOU21 · ACCTG21 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
44.44%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you , and want practical accounting tips; otherwise switch sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of HomeworkParticipation RequiredPolarizing StyleReal-Life ExamplesTest Heavy
  • Accounting , and multi-step exams.
  • some praise engaging real-world lectures and ; others call him rude, rambling, and unhelpful.
  • Attendance and class focus matter; skippers and passive students struggle.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Accounting is tough with and ; a B is common when students show effort, not a free A.

Nearly all evidence is in-person; the one online review .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Average difficulty is high and students describe dense homework, multi-step problems, and .

In-person and online both describe hard material; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Tags and comments say skip class and you will not pass; participation is enforced by cold-calling.

; the online review also flags participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

44/100

Would-take-again sits near 44% with strong love-or-hate split based on work tolerance and teaching style fit.

In-person opinions are polarized; the lone online review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Supporters say he grades fairly when he sees effort; critics still find exams and wording harsh.

Format shift

Fairness claims come from in-person; .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of , and .

Format shift

; online also reports long multi-step exams.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

engaging and helpful for some, rambling, rude, and .

Format shift

and ; online is poorly reviewed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

heavy homework feeding exam prep.

Format shift

and homework heavy; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

; fans like dynamic lectures and real-life tips while critics cite rambling, rudeness, and confusion.

Main concern

some students to drop.

What students said

“I love this professor! His class was one of the few I actually enjoyed and found fun this semester.”
ACCTG101
“I actually dropped this class because Torres was so terrible.”
ACCTG101
“Lots of work in his class, lots of .”
ACCOU21

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Single online review describes multi-step exams that feel longer than advertised and lectures poorly aligned with homework.

Main concern

Exams with many steps and .

What students said

“ because the questions can have 5-10 steps”
ACCTG062

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are multi-step and grade-heavy, with students reporting time pressure and weak lecture alignment.

Multi-Step Exam QuestionsTest HeavyHomework Aligned WeaklyTime Pressure

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some report heckling during exams and non-book wording.

Test HeavyParticipation During ClassDifficult Wording
“even heckles students during the exams ("If you aren't finished with the first half now, you might as well give up").”
ACCT21
“The grade, but if you're paying attention in class you'll do just fine!”
ACCTG021

Online

because each item can require 5-10 steps.

Multi-Step QuestionsHeavy Exam Load
“ because the questions can have 5-10 steps; even if he says there are only 25 questions, expect to feel like there is at least double”
ACCTG062

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I actually dropped this class because Torres was so terrible. He rambles, seems to have no direction, makes rude remarks”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews with strong polarization on teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“His lectures are very dynamic and engaging. He makes it easy to pay attention”

📚 Workload Intensity

24/100

“Lots of work in his class, lots of .”

👍 Recommendation Split

44/100

“Do NOT take his class. ”

🧠 Learning Payoff

60/100

“It won't be easy but do not give up, at the end, his not that ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He rambles, seems to have no direction, makes rude remarks
  • His lectures are very dynamic and engaging.
  • rambles a lot but talks a lot about real life scenarios

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of .
  • if you show him that you care and put in as much effort as you can, you'll earn no less than a B.
  • because the questions can have 5-10 steps

Theme 3

🚪 About Dropping or Avoiding

  • I actually dropped this class because Torres was so terrible.
  • I'm re-taking this class at a different .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

16 reviews with a and multi-year span, but only one online sample limits format confidence.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ACCT214 reviews
ACCTG0214 reviews
ACCTG1013 reviews
ACCOU212 reviews
ACCTG212 reviews
Show 1 more courses
ACCTG0621 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1