AI Rate Professor

Recreation

Terry Oberg

BASKETBALL · BASKETBALL1 · PHYS · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid this professor; , and poor class management make the .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh GraderToo Much BusyworkCourt Time StolenWould Not RetakeAlmost Failed Easy Class
  • Harsh unexplained deductions even in a 1-unit walking class
  • In-person basketball time was repeatedly given to the school team

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Even a 1-unit walking class nearly failed a student who submitted all work due to unexplained harsh deductions.

Online evidence shows near-fail on full submissions; in-person evidence includes a D in basketball.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content is recreation-level but busywork volume and lost class time make the experience harder than it should be.

Online walking class felt assignment-heavy; in-person basketball suffered from lost court access.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

as not mandatory while basketball required attendance yet still lost court time.

; in-person basketball listed attendance as yes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students report , and .

Both online and support.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Tagged tough grader with large unexplained deductions that nearly failed full-credit submissions.

Format shift

Online review is the clearest evidence of .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Two assignments per week in a 1-unit walking class plus lost basketball court time create poor effort-to-value load.

Format shift

Online walking class is the main workload complaint; .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Low quality ratings, poor class management, and comments like not good dominate the small sample.

Format shift

Online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Weekly assignments and drills dominate; .

Format shift

Online evidence centers on weekly assignments; in-person focuses on drills and participation time.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Basketball class started with useful drills then lost court time to the and a D grade.

Main concern

Class time was given away and overall quality was described as not good.

What students said

“Towards the fourth week she allowed the SJCC basketball team to use the courts during our class time which is unacceptable.”
BASKETBALL1
“Not good”
BASKETBALL

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online walking-for-health class had heavy weekly assignments and turned everything in.

Main concern

a supposedly light 1-unit course.

What students said

“Turned in all the work, but I almost failed the class!!”
phys

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format for in-person basketball classes.

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove exam or proctoring policy for the online class.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Turned in all the work, but I almost failed the class!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting harsh grading and poor class management. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Not good”

⚖️

12/100

“Deducted a lot of .”

👎 Recommendation

8/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📝 About Workload and Grades

  • . 2 assignments per week!
  • !
  • Turned in all the work, but I almost failed the class!!

Theme 2

🏀 About Class Management

  • allowed the SJCC basketball team to use the courts during our class time which is unacceptable
  • many people dropped the class
  • Not good

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three sparse reviews spanning 2014-2022 with limited detail and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

BASKETBALL1 review
BASKETBALL11 review
phys1 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values