AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Bijan Sadeghi

CALC1A · MATH · CALC3 · MATH73 · MATH063 · MATH78 · MATH114 · CALCULUS · MATH63 · MATH13 · STATS63 · MATH72 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Only take him if you learn well on your own and and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing TeachingUnclear ExplanationsLots of HomeworkSoft SpokenPractice Tests Help
  • Reviews and harsh unclear-mumble criticism.
  • , and whole classes failing when lectures are unclear.
  • Some students succeed by sitting , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Some students report easy As with practice tests, but many describe failing averages and .

Online student still earned an A despite poor experience; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Fast pace, unclear process, and the content tough.

Both formats report hard-to-follow lectures; in-person calculus reviews are especially harsh.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Some sections mark attendance mandatory, others say no roll is taken, so policy is inconsistent.

In-person reviews conflict; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

, but angry avoid-at-all-costs reviews nearly cancel the fans.

; in-person opinions are split by era and course.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

and , while others report no curve and class averages in the 40s.

Format shift

; online notes graded by few things.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of and repeated complaints of excessive or pointless assignments.

Format shift

Both online and .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Praise for clarity and care is real but outweighed by chronic reports of mumbling, rushing, and confusion.

Format shift

Online lecture quality is poor; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, while exams and a few graded items drive the grade.

Format shift

In-person reviews dominate; tags note graded by few things.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

As and practice exams, others say he mumbles, rushes, and fails whole classes.

Main concern

Unclear lectures, soft speaking, and .

What students said

“He barely explains anything & goes through the material too quickly. The entire class is failing at the moment.”
CALC1A
“He is one of the best math teachers ever. He really cares about his students”
CALC1A
“Unable or unwilling to teach. Often late to class, mumbles things & scribbles on the board.”
MATH72

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online review found lectures , content scattered, and .

Main concern

Hard-to-follow online lectures and .

What students said

“His lectures were always very even when he upgraded to an iPad to better share screen with us.”
MATH063

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Practice tests can mirror real exams, but many .

Practice Tests Similar to ExamHard MidtermsOccasional Makeup ExamsNo Curve Common

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are often hard with low averages; .

Practice Tests Similar to ExamHard MidtermsMakeup ExamsNo Curve Common
“He gives out a he gives in class.”
MATH72
“everyone failed the tests with 30's.”
CALC3
“class average was 42% and .”
MATH72

Online

Online review does not detail proctoring or open-book policy; focus is on scattered lectures and .

Heavy Homework
“ .”
MATH063

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unable or unwilling to teach. Often late to class, mumbles things & scribbles on the board.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews (1 online, 26 in person), highlighting polarization in clarity and outcomes. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Clarity

30/100

“He barely explains anything & goes through the material too quickly. The entire class is failing at the moment.”

❤️ Caring Side

70/100

“ and make sure his students learn and pass the class easily.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were always very
  • he speaks softly
  • He explains math very clearly, understood his methods way better than the book

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You will pass with A easily
  • everyone failed the tests with 30's
  • class average was 42% and

Theme 3

💔 Polarizing Reputation

  • He is one of the best math teachers ever
  • ! HORRIBLE "TEACHER"

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-seven reviews over many years with detailed conflicting narratives give a reliable picture of a polarizing instructor.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH726 reviews
CALC1A4 reviews
MATH634 reviews
MATH0633 reviews
MATH732 reviews
Show 8 more courses
279171 review
CALC31 review
CALCULUS1 review
MATH1 review
MATH1141 review
MATH131 review
MATH781 review
STATS631 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1