AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hema Nadkarni

MATH11A · MATH311 · CALC73 · MATH013 · MATH071 · MATH63 · MATH13 · MATH11 · MATH10 · MATH111 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
51/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Workable if and use her practice tests; skip if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPractice tests match examsHard to understandSelf-teach requiredFair/lenient gradingNice personality
  • Many students call her nice and .
  • Others struggle with accent clarity and feel they must teach themselves.
  • , but upper-level pacing and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

and , but some still earn mid or low grades without solid prep.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

58/100

Many lower math sections feel manageable, though calc and compressed pacing raise difficulty for others.

In-person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

while others explicitly do not.

In-person only with mixed reports.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

About half would retake; praise for niceness and .

In-person only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Students say exams nearly identical to the real ones.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Light

62/100

, though some courses pile long homework and cram sessions.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

and hard-to-understand or .

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and study guides more than heavy projects.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All reviews are in person and and complaints about clarity, cramming, and self-teaching.

Main concern

Lecture clarity and self-teaching burden for some students.

What students said

“She gives out practice tests that are basically identical to the actual test.”
MATH311
“You basically teach yourself, and I personally do not learn that way.”
MATH013
“She is a great teacher in my eyes! Very attentive to students”
MATH013

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

provided practice materials.

Practice tests nearly identicalTimed testsStudy guidesCurve grading

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and closely match practice tests or study guides.

Practice tests nearly identicalTimed examsStudy guides before tests
“She gives out practice tests that are basically identical to the actual test.”
MATH311
“ but exactly as study guide.”
MATH11
“Better be quick with doing exams because you only get 1hr.”
CALC73

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , so it's not hard to pass them. She gives out practice tests that are basically identical to the actual test.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 , and fair grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

78/100

“ help you study”

🗣️ Clarity Concerns

35/100

“you can hardly understand what she is saying”

🙂 Personality

70/100

“She's patient and really nice!”

📘 Self-Teaching Load

40/100

“You basically teach yourself, and I personally do not learn that way.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy to earn the grade. Hard to learn the subject
  • Study and review the hw and you will pass the class

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the way and makes math problems seem quite simple
  • Nice lady but cant seem to teach the upper level math very well
  • I couldn't really understand her english

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She's adorable
  • and fair in the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

15 in-person reviews spanning many years with and clarity, though several older sparse comments lower confidence.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH0134 reviews
MATH132 reviews
MATH3112 reviews
CALC731 review
MATH0711 review
Show 5 more courses
MATH101 review
MATH111 review
MATH1111 review
MATH11A1 review
MATH631 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 1 · A- 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values