AI Rate Professor

Language Arts

Scott Inguito

ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENGLB · ENGLISH92 · HUMNT002 · ENG080 · ENG001A · ENG921AC · E1B · ENG1B · ENGLI123 · ENG101 · EN1B · MEXICANLIT · ENG92 · HUM002 · ENG1C · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Worth taking if you will put real effort into essays and , but avoid if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEssay HeavyConference GradingPassionate About PoetrySlow Email ResponseReading Intensive
  • , and one-on-one essay conferences.
  • Workload centers on multiple essays and .
  • Online ENG1C sections draw and ignored emails.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many call it an easy A if , but several note you must show effort and writing quality.

Online poetry and some summer sections feel easier; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

and humanities with reading and essays rather than abstract theory.

Online humanities can feel light; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

In-person comments warn against skipping and .

In-person reviews emphasize mandatory presence; online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most praise passion, clarity, and writing growth, though a vocal minority warn against online unresponsiveness.

In-person recommendations are stronger; online ENG1C reviews are more mixed or negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and second chances, but some say he grades hard early or reneges on promised grades.

Format shift

Online feedback is thinner; .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect , and required books rather than endless busywork.

Format shift

Both formats are essay-driven; online may add weekly forums and book-based finals.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Many call him excellent, passionate, and clear, while a minority report disengagement and .

Format shift

Teaching praise is stronger in person; online quality is more polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and papers with few traditional exams.

Format shift

Online and in-person both center essays; some .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English courses are often loved for , and real writing growth.

Main concern

and you must work for the A .

What students said

“ !”
ENG92
“the . you get one on one feedback which helps so much hes great!”
ENGL1A
“Its not easy or hard but you do have to work for your grade”
ENG1C

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections range from easy poetry or short-essay classes to ENG1C complaints about delayed grading and .

Main concern

Several , and unanswered emails.

What students said

“Easy A and nice easy going teacher. .”
HUMNT002
“ . Literally doesnt care about his students dont sign up for his class.”
ENG1C
“He did not grade anything until a few days before the semester was over.”
ENG1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly essays and writing conferences rather than high-stakes proctored exams.

Essay BasedFew Timed ExamsConference GradingBook-Based Papers

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person grades rest on multiple essays and .

Multiple EssaysConference GradingWorksheet Support
“Whatever you score on all the .”
E1B
“There were 5 papers including the .”
ENGL1A

Online

Online work is forums, short essays, and .

Online EssaysForum PostsBook Paper FinalNo Proctoring Mentioned
“A . 2 papers & a .”
ENG1C
“-One essay. -Does not accept late work but was able to during pandemic. - '.”
HUMNT002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Inguito is by far the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews (9 online, 23 in-person), , and online support gaps. Credibility rating: High.

✍️ Writing Growth

78/100

“the . you get one on one feedback which helps so much hes great!”

⚠️ Online Responsiveness

35/100

“ if you need help. and is not uunderstanding for student circumstances.”

📚 Essay Load

48/100

“I believe there . Whatever you score on all the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's super laid back, classes are interesting and so are the essay topics.
  • He is very passionate about teaching and poetry.
  • His lectures aren't so long, he gives you worksheets and and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's some effort you have to put in to get an A but it's not hard.
  • Easy class for those who don't want to do much work.
  • Good Teacher, but you need to work for hard for an A grade.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • .
  • He did not grade anything until a few days before the semester was over.
  • Excellent Professor! He is very passionate about teaching and poetry.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-two reviews span many years with mixed but , and online responsiveness.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1C6 reviews
ENG1A4 reviews
ENG1B4 reviews
E1B2 reviews
ENG922 reviews
Show 12 more courses
ENGLISH922 reviews
HUMNT0022 reviews
EN1B1 review
ENG001A1 review
ENG0801 review
ENG1011 review
ENG921AC1 review
ENGL1A1 review
ENGLB1 review
ENGLI1231 review
HUM0021 review
MEXICANLIT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1