AI Rate Professor

Construction Technology

Jerry Kauffman

CNSTR101 · CIEG440 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Use him for a low-effort A if you can tolerate flat lectures and ; do not expect engaging teaching.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy A GiverBoring LecturesScattered NotesCaring but FlatWorkman-like
  • Students say he is nice and essentially hands out As, yet lectures feel boring and .
  • Notes and tech use are messy, with .
  • Only two reviews exist, so confidence in patterns is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

One detailed review says he basically gives everyone an A, and difficulty ratings stay low.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Content is not hard, but delivery is slow and unengaging rather than intellectually light by design.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

One course lists attendance not mandatory while .

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

and complaints about boredom and random exams outweigh kindness.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students report near-automatic As and .

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Workload

Light

72/100

Low difficulty and few high-stakes components keep effort modest if .

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

He is caring and respected but lectures are boring and technology use is weak.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of sparse graded items, notes, and tests that reward attention in class.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

and low-stakes with a nice instructor, but lectures are slow and notes are scattered.

Main concern

Boring delivery and .

What students said

“Professor is really nice and will basically give everyone an A in the class.”
CIEG440
“His lectures are slow and a bit flat.”
CNSTR101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams can feel random based on brief lecture mentions, but .

Random lecture questionsAttendance-linked gradesFew graded items

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; notes matter for top scores.

Random exam questionsNotes important
“ may have mentioned once in lecture.”
CIEG440
“Pay attention and test.”
CNSTR101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor is really nice and will basically give everyone an A in the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting easy grading versus weak delivery. Credibility rating: Low.

🎁 Grade Generosity

90/100

“will basically give everyone an A in the class”

😴 Lecture Energy

40/100

“the lectures are extremely boring and its impossible to pay attention”

📂 Organization

35/100

“does not know how to use technology at all, so all the notes will be scattered in ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are slow and a bit flat
  • easy-going manner
  • classes are workman-like

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • basically give everyone an A
  • Graded by few things

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews years apart provide limited, mixed detail and weak statistical reliability.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIEG4401 review
CNSTR1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values