AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Russell Haynes

CHEM32A · CHEM30A · CHEM1B · CHEM1A · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if , and tolerate a demanding classroom tone.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderPop quizzesGroup projectsUneven teachingMandatory attendance
  • Reviews split hard between helpful group-work mentor and .
  • , and .
  • Lectures may feel .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

, and B-range grades mean an A requires serious sustained effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Chemistry content plus dense lectures and heavy work make the course intellectually demanding.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and warns that skipping class hurts your chance to pass.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; others urge students to steer clear.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tags and comments emphasize tough grading and grades driven by few assessments.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of homework, group projects, labs, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some praise knowledge and feedback while others say lectures copy the book and belittle students.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework, group projects, pop quizzes, and focus.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person chemistry with group work and pop quizzes; praise for knowledge and and disrespect complaints.

Main concern

, and reports of disrespectful lecture style.

What students said

“ unless you like teaching yourself”
CHEM1A
“He gave a lot of work but ”
CHEM32A
“Professor Haynes was extremely disrespectful to a lot of his students and made fun of them in class”
CHEM1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Frequent pop quizzes and sparse high-stakes grading create a high-pressure assessment feel; .

Pop quizzesFew graded itemsGroup projectsMandatory attendance

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and limited graded items dominate; formal exam software is not clearly described.

Pop quizzesTough graderGraded by few things
“Graded by few things, Beware of ”
CHEM1A
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
CHEM1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you like teaching yourself”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 polarized in-person reviews. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Split

48/100

“His lectures are direct copy and pasted from the textbook so not much help”

⚠️ Classroom Tone

25/100

“Professor Haynes was extremely disrespectful to a lot of his students and made fun of them in class”

👍 Helpful Side

70/100

“I found Prof Haynes to be one of and knowledgeable teachers”

📚 Workload

30/100

“He gave a lot of work but ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I liked the format of the class and the teacher was good
  • Google and youtube has been my savior in this course
  • He does a lot of group work and that helped me

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Beware of pop quizzes
  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • extremely disrespectful to a lot of his students
  • His patience is very low
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

and limited grade detail lower confidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM1A2 reviews
CHEM1B1 review
CHEM30A1 review
CHEM32A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2