AI Rate Professor

Physics

Moisey Sandler

PHYS2AB · PHYS002A · PHYS2B · PHIS4A · PHYS4A · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
54.55%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Solid pick if you can handle his accent and will use and review materials; skip if you need a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but polarizingExtra credit heavyAccent barrierLecture heavyFormula sheets on tests
  • Many students call him caring and
  • Others report belittling tone, strong accent, and vague or
  • Physics content is manageable if you use problem sets, formula sheets, and outside videos

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple students report easy and exams, and As with problem sets and attention.

Nearly all grade-friendly evidence is from in-person PHYS2B; the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Physics concepts can be tricky, but many call the , and formula sheets are used.

In-person reviews range from easy to hard; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and note that paying attention in .

In-person reviews mostly say mandatory; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; fans praise care and while critics warn of accent and attitude.

Recommendation split .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

and exams and As, though some call him a tough grader.

Format shift

Leniency comments come from in-person reviews; .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Usually a modest number of and problem sets plus quizzes; a few report lots of homework.

Format shift

Workload detail .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

and cares, but accent, boredom, and belittling comments pull the experience down for many.

Format shift

In-person reviews are strongly mixed; online is lukewarm on teaching clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Quizzes, midterms, and ; homework and participation mainly help via .

Format shift

Test-heavy tags and comments are from in-person PHYS courses.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and formula sheets, while others call him belittling, late to office hours, and test-heavy.

Main concern

Accent, occasional belittling tone, and .

What students said

“Phys2B concepts can be difficult to understand, but he does a great job at explaining them. He offers .”
PHYS2B
“ .”
PHYS2B
“easy class, easy grades, but unbelievably boring.”
PHYS2B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single older online review notes he cares about learning but language barrier is large and .

Main concern

Language barrier and .

What students said

“He cares alot about your learning, but there is a huge language barrier. . Make sure to study on your own.”
PHYS4A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams track lectures and and review, but some students find questions vague or hard.

Formula sheets allowedLecture-based testsExtra credit on quizzes/examsSometimes vague or tricky questions

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and review; some call them fair with , others call them vague and hard.

Formula sheetsLecture-basedExtra creditTricky or vague questions
“get to use formula sheets for quizzes/exams.”
PHYS2B
“ because many times the question has typos and/or are extremely vague.”
PHYS2B

Online

Only note is that tests are hard and ; .

Hard tests
“ . Make sure to study on your own.”
PHYS4A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ so far.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews (1 online, 16 in person), highlighting mixed teaching quality, grading, and accent concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“ and really wants you to understand that.”

⭐ Easy Grades via

78/100

“He is super easy. He gives you a lot of chances to to problem in class and hw for .”

⚠️ Polarizing Classroom Tone

40/100

“He's passionate about physics, but also impatient and belittling if you don't understand the material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's super good at explaining stuff and I had a
  • His lectures cover everything and are detailed too
  • His lectures is all over the place with formula only without math examples

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • easy class, easy grades, but unbelievably boring
  • just make sure that you master every problems in the hw then you will get an A+
  • His quizzes and

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He cares about each student and will pull you aside to help you if he notices you are having problems
  • and talks down on you if you dont understand something
  • You couldn't find a nicer professor elsewhere

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across years with detailed comments, but strong polarity and mostly older PHYS2B in-person data reduce certainty.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PHYS2B12 reviews
PHYS002A2 reviews
PHIS4A1 review
PHYS2AB1 review
PHYS4A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1