AI Rate Professor

Early Childhood Education

Elizabeth Sharpe

ECE101 · ECE105 · EVE102 · ECE109 · ECE102 · ECE · ECE195 · ECE108 · ECE191 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid if possible; if you must and can .

Best fit · Self Taught ProBiased and unprofessionalHeavy outside workloadScatter-brained lecturesBribe allegationsMandatory attendance
  • Many students call her unprofessional, biased, and off-topic about family and religion.
  • Workload is often heavy with projects and .
  • while learning value is widely disputed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some call it an easy A if you show up and participate, but others say grades feel biased or tied to favors.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty varies; many report heavy projects and stress more than deep conceptual challenge.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and workshops are required.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and many say never take her class again.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

A few say show up and participate for a good grade; others allege discrimination and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report tons of , and spending like a part-time job.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Scattered lectures, interruptions, and family stories dominate; a minority finds her helpful and excellent.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and projects outweigh formal exams in comments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ECE courses draw polarized feedback: some praise real-world stories and help, but many report bias, chaos, bribe talk, and little real learning.

Main concern

Unprofessional favoritism, scatter-brained lectures, and .

What students said

“She is very biased and unprofessional.”
ECE108
“We learn nothing in her class except stories about her family and her religion.”
ECE
“BUT, it's an easy A.”
ECE102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and workshops more than traditional high-stakes exams.

Group presentations for examsHomework summariesWorkshops

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Two group presentations are used for exams in literacy curriculum classes; .

Group presentationsHomework-heavyWorkshops
“Two group presentations for exams.”
ECE105
“Same hw summaries+workshops) like in her other classes.”
ECE105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is very biased and unprofessional.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 in-person reviews spanning 2009-2019; credibility Medium due to sample size and mixed but mostly negative tone.

⚠️ Professionalism Concerns

25/100

“She is very biased and unprofessional.”

📚 Teaching Value

30/100

“We learn nothing in her class except stories about her family and her religion.”

📉 Recommendation

18/100

“ if you like her.”

📝 Workload

28/100

“she gives so much work outside of class its like a part-time job.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • she rambles on and on about her own life during class time
  • Love her lectures!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • BUT, it's an easy A.
  • if you show up and participate you will get a good grade
  • There's a lot of work, but she never checks it

Theme 3

💔 About Fairness

  • She favors some students and does preferential treatment.
  • She openly asks for bribes in class
  • She is discriminated when she gives grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen in-person reviews span 2009-2019 with strong negative consistency but some positive outliers and older dates.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ECE1054 reviews
ECE1022 reviews
ECE1 review
ECE1011 review
ECE1081 review
Show 4 more courses
ECE1091 review
ECE1911 review
ECE1951 review
EVE1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1