AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mohammad Hussain

MATH11A · MATH72 · MATH014 · MATH25 · ALGEBRA · MKTG649 · MATH51 · MATH63 · MATH61 · STATS · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you will use office hours and want a ; skip if you need crystal-clear lectures without extra effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardWilling to helpMixed clarityTest retakesNice personalityPolarizing lectures
  • Many students call him nice and .
  • Others say he is unclear, unorganized, or assumes you already know the answer.
  • Summer and some upper math sections feel harder and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

and , but you still need to show up and push for clarity to earn a solid mark.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Difficulty sits around mid-range; summer pacing can feel fast while regular sections are more manageable.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Multiple comments treat attendance as required, especially in summer and marketing sections.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Helpful personality and , but clarity complaints keep overall recommendation mixed.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Described as a to understand material.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Group projects and regular math work appear; no consistent reports of .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

66/100

Helpful and personable for many, yet others report confusion, frustration, and weak lecture clarity.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Tests, group projects, and every course.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person math and stats reviews are split between helpful, flexible teaching and .

Main concern

Clarity and organization vary widely by student and course.

What students said

“Really willing to help out. Will compromise with students. that well.”
MATH72
“VERY NICE, BUT AND UNORGANIZED.”
MATH11A
“ summer and it was super fast paced but with his intelligence he made it easy to understand.”
STATS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are standard math assessments; .

Test revisionsIn-class practice emphasis

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams can be adjusted when students struggle; .

Test revisionsStandard math exams
“ that well.”
MATH72
“ !!!”
MATH51

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Really willing to help out. Will compromise with students. that well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person reviews, balancing praise for help with complaints about clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🤝 Helpfulness

72/100

“ and helpful. as many times as it takes.”

😕 Clarity Issues

40/100

“VERY NICE, BUT AND UNORGANIZED.”

👍 Recommendation Split

55/100

“I would never recomend this teacher. He does not know how to answer questions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • with his intelligence he made it easy to understand.
  • HE SOMETIMES GETS FRUSTRATED WHEN YOU ASK QUESTIONS
  • Great guy, terrific instructor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you will pass but
  • ..he will bring ur balls into ur throat....

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • very nice...brought us candy on the first day of class.
  • A .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews provide volume, but many are old (2003-2015) and opinions conflict on clarity versus helpfulness.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH634 reviews
MATH0142 reviews
MATH512 reviews
ALGEBRA1 review
MATH11A1 review
Show 5 more courses
MATH251 review
MATH611 review
MATH721 review
MKTG6491 review
STATS1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values