AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

David Feiler

CHEM1B · 001B · CHEM001A · CHEM1A · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

if you already excel in chemistry and will study nonstop; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard ExamsNew Teacher Growing PainsMixed HelpfulnessHigh Drop RiskLecture-Test Mismatch
  • Chemistry content is hard and as tougher than lectures.
  • Some students praise after-class help and ; and unhelpful.
  • Older 2014-2015 reviews are split, with and low test averages.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Passing is possible with heavy studying and homework, but A-level performance and low averages.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Chemistry content is inherently tough and students describe high difficulty, fast standards, and lots of required study.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and others stress showing up and not falling behind.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Several students and ruined interest in chemistry.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, but and reports of 50% averages show tough grading overall.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Homework and ; students who keep up can pass, but falling behind is costly.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Some find him thorough and helpful, but many call lectures unclear, unhelpful, or below community-college standards.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

and labs as supporting work rather than the main grade story.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, heavy study needs, and uneven teaching while he was newer.

Main concern

and class averages can be very low.

What students said

“ and during lecture.”
CHEM1B
“Completely unhelpful and misguiding, there was not one person in this class that enjoyed his teaching and his class test averages have been 50%!!!”
CHEM1A
“His exams are pretty hard but he allows us to submit test corrections in .”
001B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequently hard and sometimes misaligned with lecture focus, though .

Hard ExamsTest CorrectionsLecture-Test Mismatch

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are described as hard, sometimes off-lecture, with .

Hard ExamsTest CorrectionsLecture-Test Mismatch
“His exams are pretty hard but he allows us to submit test corrections in .”
001B
“ and during lecture.”
CHEM1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easily the . This is a subject I enjoy, but after taking his class all joy for the subject has been lost.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews spanning 2014-2015, highlighting teaching inconsistency and . Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

35/100

“Easily the .”

📉

32/100

“His exams are pretty hard but he allows us to submit test corrections in .”

🚫 Recommendation

28/100

“ !”

🧪 Study Burden

28/100

“The key to passing this class is study study study.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Feiler is a great teacher. Although he is a part time and knows his chemistry.
  • and during lecture.
  • Completely unhelpful and misguiding

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but he
  • his class test averages have been 50%!!!
  • The key to passing this class is study study study.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Warnings

  • !
  • !!
  • if you can.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are all from 2014-2015 and opinions are mixed, which limits current confidence.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM1A4 reviews
001B1 review
CHEM001A1 review
CHEM1B1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1