AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Jesus Angulo

ETH25 · ETH27 · SSC3 · ETH027 · ETHN027 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a and can handle uneven structure; not a guaranteed strong learning experience.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring about studentsUnstructured lecturesEssay-heavyEasy A possibleMixed classroom control
  • some praise clarity and care, others call classes unstructured and unclear.
  • One review explicitly calls the class an Easy A with little learned.
  • Attendance and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

A student explicitly called the class Easy A, and several difficulty ratings were low despite mixed teaching quality.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is not usually described as brutal, but and essay-based rather than conceptually deep.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

One student praised understanding about absences, while another said they were dropped after a single absence without notice.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Some students wish he still taught and felt supported; others found the class a waste of time with weak structure.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Easy A comments and moderate quality scores suggest grades are reachable without elite performance.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

More essays than quizzes and but not overwhelming load.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Students praise care and clarity in places, but and weak class control.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Reviews emphasize essays and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and essay-focused, but lectures can be repetitive and poorly structured, with mixed classroom control.

Main concern

and occasional harsh drops after absence can frustrate students seeking consistency.

What students said

“Easy A”
ETH027
“He really cares about you and experience as a student.”
ETH25
“ to structure his classes better”
ETH027

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans toward essays rather than high-stakes proctored exams, with .

Essay-focusedFew quizzes and tests

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections emphasize essays over quizzes and .

Essay-focusedFew quizzes and tests
“ and test.”
ETH027

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He really cares about you and experience as a student. Unlike other professors who drop you for tardies or absences, this professor is understanding.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews spanning 2006-2015, highlighting care, structure, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Student Care

70/100

“He really cares about you and experience as a student.”

📚 Structure Issues

40/100

“ to structure his classes better, keeps repeating unclear ideas in lectures.”

🅰️ Grade Accessibility

78/100

“Easy A”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and always asking students how he can help.
  • he had no control of the class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A
  • and test.

Theme 3

📋 About Policies

  • this professor is understanding
  • He dropped me and didn't tell me(After one absence during inter).

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Six mostly older in-person reviews (2006-2015) with mixed detail and .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ETH0272 reviews
ETH251 review
ETH271 review
ETHN0271 review
SSC31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values