AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Patricia Carson

ACCOUNTING30 · ACCTG30 · ACCOUNTING030 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and tolerate zero support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnprofessionalDoes not respondError-filled finalsLate gradesSelf-teach only
  • All three reviews rate quality 1 and call her rude, sloppy, and unprofessional.
  • Assignments and grades are posted weeks late with multi-month grade delays.
  • Finals and materials contain repeated errors that force last-minute revisions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Difficulty ratings are all 1 and one student still earned an A despite calling the class awful.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

Students rate difficulty at 1 and frame the work as make-work rather than intellectually hard.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Every review and describes an unprofessional disaster.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One student received an A, but grade release is extremely late and .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Work is described as pointless make-work and .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students call her the and atrocious online lectures.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments mention a final exam full of errors plus a .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online accounting sections are described as chaotic with late , and rude communication.

Main concern

and constant instructor errors on graded work.

What students said

“She may be the worse instructor I have ever had.”
ACCOUNTING30
“ . Posts assignments to do 2 and 3 weeks late.”
ACCOUNTING030
“She had to revise her final THREE times from the amount of errors.”
ACCTG30

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Finals are described as error-ridden disasters requiring multiple instructor revisions.

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online finals are reported as error-filled and revised multiple times; .

Error-filled finalMultiple final revisions
“ .”
ACCOUNTING30
“She had to revise her final THREE times from the amount of errors.”
ACCTG30

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She may be the worse instructor I have ever had.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 online reviews with fully consistent negative themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Quality

8/100

“She may be the worse instructor I have ever had.”

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“If you want to learn anything from the .”

⏱️

10/100

“She takes FOREVER to give you your grades (as in 2 month turnaround time).”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • incredibly inconsiderate, sloppy, and unprofessional
  • her online watchable lectures are atrocious
  • Always posts things late

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Never tells you your grade until the school itself posts them
  • She

Theme 3

📧 About Communication

  • Also she is rude
  • extremely rude and lags on responding to emails

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three consistent all-negative online reviews from 2014 give a but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ACCOUNTING0301 review
ACCOUNTING301 review
ACCTG301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather_Not_Say 1