AI Rate Professor

Computer Applications

Sharon Youngblood

ACC101 · ACCTG101 · ACCOUNTING101 · CA10 · ACCTG · CA100D · ACCT101 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can , and tolerate a mixed teaching reputation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizingHomework-heavyAttendance strictSupportive for someLate and unprepared for others
  • and fair versus late and unclear.
  • Homework and as survival requirements.
  • Accounting content feels challenging and but can be fair if you keep up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students earn A's with steady work, but others lose grades late and call her tough.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Accounting feels challenging for many, though typing and some sections read easier.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Students stress showing up every day and say missing a day can force a drop.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Roughly half the while .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

and helpful; critics still describe tough standards and .

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

multi-part finals for some.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Quality and complaints of confusion, lateness, and weak subject knowledge.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and classwork all matter.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person accounting and computer-apps classes feel polarizing: supporters praise care and fairness while critics slam lateness, weak content mastery, and .

Main concern

Inconsistent preparation, long breaks, and harsh experiences if you miss class or fall behind.

What students said

“She is tough, but extremely fair and . She pushes .”
ACCOUNTING101
“The . She doesn't prepare well on her lectures, not answer emails”
ACCT101
“If you miss a day you might as ...no joke.”
ACC101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment mixes homework and a .

Multi-part finalHomework criticalIn-person exams

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

time if assignments are mis-planned.

3-part finalHomework-driven
“ and gave us very little time to prepare for the 3-part final.”
ACCTG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I cannot believe some of the comments here; Mrs. Youngblood is an excellent, supportive, challenging, instructor who really cares about the students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person reviews, , and homework focus. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality Split

48/100

“The . She doesn't prepare well on her lectures, not answer emails”

❤️ Supportive Side

70/100

“Mrs Youngblood really cared about our success. and .”

📅

22/100

“If you miss a day you might as ...no joke.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't know the content well, not answer emails
  • ! annoying! She knows her content but

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I had three of her classes and received A's. She is tough, but extremely fair
  • I had an A in her class until the last 3 weeks
  • and fair in grading

Theme 3

⏰ About Lateness & Class Time

  • She is late all the time. Late at beginning of the classes
  • The breaks were always longer than what she said
  • And late often.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

but highly polarized detail and no grade distribution.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ACCT1017 reviews
ACC1012 reviews
ACCOUNTING1012 reviews
ACCTG1 review
ACCTG1011 review
Show 2 more courses
CA101 review
CA100D1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values