AI Rate Professor

Economics

Shireen Alazzawi

ECON10B · ECON3 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you are willing to study hard for the grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear explanationsHard work requiredMostly recommendedCan feel boringTextbook used
  • and effort to check understanding.
  • A good grade still requires real work, not minimal effort.
  • Sample is small and mixed with one sparse boring review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

A student explicitly says hard work is required for a good grade.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty ratings sit around moderate with one easy and one harder review.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Two strong endorsements outweigh one thin boring comment.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

No free-A language; grades track .

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Students say real study work is needed for a good grade.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

and care for .

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments focus on understanding .

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

teaching, with one student calling lectures boring.

Main concern

You still need to work hard for a strong grade, and engagement can lag for some.

What students said

“ and theories very well. She does make an effort to make sure everyone understands the materials.”
ECON3
“you DO need to work hard to get a good grade in this class. .”
ECON3
“boring”
ECON10B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format details beyond needing solid study for grades.

Work-hard gradingTextbook used

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

open-book policies.

Study-required grades
“you DO need to work hard to get a good grade in this class.”
ECON3

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great Professor! and theories very well. She does make an effort to make sure everyone understands the materials.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting clear teaching and effort-based grades. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

78/100

“ and theories very well. She does make an effort to make sure everyone understands the materials.”

📈 Effort for Grades

40/100

“you DO need to work hard to get a good grade in this class.”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and theories very well
  • wonderful professor!
  • boring

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you DO need to work hard to get a good grade in this class
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only three older in-person reviews with limited assessment detail and no grades reported.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ECON10B2 reviews
ECON31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values