AI Rate Professor

Biology

June Sheldon

PHYS60 · BIO061 · BIO61 · HEREDITY · PHYSO60 · HUMANHERE · BIOHUMGEN · MICRO70 · ENVSCIENCE10 · ENVIR10 · PHYSIO60 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless no alternative; if you can learn almost entirely from the book.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedLate to classPersonal storiesReads PowerPointPolarizing
  • Majority describe severe disorganization, lateness, and off-topic personal beliefs
  • Course material can be heavy with weekly quizzes and dense content
  • A and knowledgeable if

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Heavy material, tough or mismatched exams, and students.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Lots of material weekly plus dense bio content make the course intellectually demanding.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; lectures are often late or off-topic either way.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most urge last resort only, citing disorganization and poor teaching despite a few fans.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Students report tough or unfair tests, ignored study guides, and grades that feel .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and lots of lecture information.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

, and confusion dominate student accounts.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Weekly quizzes and several exams drive grades; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person bio and science classes are widely called disorganized and , though a few praise patience and knowledge if .

Main concern

Disorganization, lateness, mismatched study guides, and personal agendas in lecture.

What students said

“Mrs. Sheldon is the .”
BIO61
“ !”
HEREDITY
“ , and cares about student's academic achievement.”
MICRO70

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are frequent and often do not match study guides, forcing full book study.

Weekly quizzesMultiple examsStudy guide mismatchBook-heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and multi-exam formats with disputed study-guide alignment.

Weekly quizzesMultiple examsStudy guide mismatchBook-heavy
“Her study guide was total B.S. The !”
BIO61
“ . Tough class due to material covered.”
HUMANHERE

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mrs. Sheldon is the . Take as last resort!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person reviews, emphasizing disorganization with minority praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“complete scatterbrain. unable to lecture without dispensing whacked out personal beliefs.”

🚫 Recommendation

28/100

“ !”

📚

40/100

“JUST READ THE BOOK AND YOU .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She reads directly from the powerpoint and tells stories about her personal life.
  • She goes off course and tells unrelated stories and then rushes through lecture.
  • , and cares about student's academic achievement.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she just made up grades based on how she thought you did
  • If students study the material they can easily pass the class.

Theme 3

⚠️ Organization Issues

  • She is constantly late to class, does not have her materials ready.
  • continuously changed syllabus regarding quizes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve polarizing in-person reviews from 2004-2009 are detailed and mostly consistent on disorganization, with a minority of positives.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

BIO612 reviews
BIO0611 review
BIOHUMGEN1 review
ENVIR101 review
ENVSCIENCE101 review
Show 6 more courses
HEREDITY1 review
HUMANHERE1 review
MICRO701 review
PHYS601 review
PHYSIO601 review
PHYSO601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values