AI Rate Professor

Accounting

David Pan

ACCT63 · ACCT62 · ACT62 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if ; lectures and expectations may not align.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed ReviewsExpects More Than He TeachesUnprepared LecturesNotes Allowed on TestsThorough When On
  • .
  • He can be thorough and , but may expect more than he teaches.
  • Some students report weak prep and little learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

One , but others say he expects more than he teaches, so an A still takes work.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty ratings are mid-range; material is standard accounting with uneven lecture depth.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

One student calls him the ; two others report weak prep and little learning.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Notes may be allowed on tests, but expectations can still exceed lecture content.

Format shift

In-person only; .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not heavily detailed; challenge comes more from teaching-expectation gaps.

Format shift

In-person only; no online workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

thorough and and unhelpful for others.

Format shift

In-person only; no online teaching evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Tests matter, and at least one section allows notes to support understanding.

Format shift

In-person only; exam comments are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

clear and note-friendly for some, underprepared and over-expecting for others.

Main concern

He .

What students said

“He did not prepare well for the class, and did not like complicated questions”
ACCT63
“HE LOVES WHAT HE DOES BUT EXPECTS MORE THAN WHAT HE TEACHES”
ACCT62
“ ...Very thorough and clear...Allows use of notes”
ACT62

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

At least one class allows notes on tests; .

Notes allowed on testsLecture-based material

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

One positive review states notes are allowed on tests; other reviews do not spell out proctoring.

Notes allowed on tests
“Allows use of notes to ”
ACT62
“EXPECTS MORE THAN WHAT HE TEACHES”
ACCT62

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“HE LOVES WHAT HE DOES BUT EXPECTS MORE THAN WHAT HE TEACHES”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting mixed teaching quality and expectation gaps. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“I learned very little from his teaching.”

📚 Thorough When Strong

70/100

“ ...Very thorough and clear”

⚠️ Expectation Gap

35/100

“HE LOVES WHAT HE DOES BUT EXPECTS MORE THAN WHAT HE TEACHES”

📝

65/100

“Allows use of notes to ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very thorough and clear...Has interactive lectures
  • He always repeated the same simple accounting principles.
  • He did not prepare well for the class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • EXPECTS MORE THAN WHAT HE TEACHES
  • Allows use of notes to
  • I learned very little from his teaching.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • HE LOVES WHAT HE DOES
  • as well

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three older mixed reviews show real polarity but limited sample size and sparse grade data.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCT621 review
ACCT631 review
ACT621 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values