AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Leandra Martin

MATH51 · MATH25 · MATH52 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedLearned NothingWaste of TimeUnpreparedMimic-to-Pass Grading
  • Students say , and unprepared.
  • Multiple reviews report learning nothing and calling the class a waste of time.
  • as odd, rewarding mimicry over independent thinking.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One review says you can do fine by mimicking her exactly, but teaching quality undercuts reliable learning for an A.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Rated low difficulty overall, yet poor teaching makes the material hard to learn even when content seems basic.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students call the class a total waste of time and report learning nothing.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

as weird and mimic-based rather than clearly lenient or harsh.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

Comments focus on poor .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Repeated claims of disorganization, unpreparedness, and learning nothing.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews emphasize teaching and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math courses with consistent complaints about disorganization, poor time use, and little learning.

Main concern

Disorganized lectures and understanding.

What students said

“Talks non-stop, disorganized, scattered, strong opinions, she knows no mathematics but she thinks she knows. Learned nothing.”
MATH52
“Learned nothing. and she was unprepared most of the time.”
MATH25
“She teaches and GRADES on a weird basis, basically if you can't think for yourself, but you can mimic exactly what she does, you'll do fine.”
MATH51

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exam format; her methods.

Mimic-Based Grading

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; students mainly criticize weird grading that rewards mimicking her process.

Mimic-Based Grading
“She teaches and GRADES on a weird basis, basically if you can't think for yourself, but you can mimic exactly what she does, you'll do fine.”
MATH51

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Learned nothing. and she was unprepared most of the time. A total waste of time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting disorganization and poor learning outcomes. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ ... Learned nothing.”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“A total waste of time. Went to de Anza instead.”

⚖️

50/100

“if you can't think for yourself, but you can mimic exactly what she does, you'll do fine.”

Theme 1

📉 About Teaching Quality

  • unprepared most of the time
  • Learned nothing.

Theme 2

📈

  • GRADES on a weird basis
  • mimic exactly what she does, you'll do fine
  • Some people are not born to be educators.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three older but highly consistent negative in-person reviews provide a .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH251 review
MATH511 review
MATH521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values