AI Rate Professor

Business

Joshua Kas-Osaka

BUS071 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Avoid if you want real teaching; if you are fine self-learning from a free textbook.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAI grades homeworkWeak teachingTough graderTextbook definitions onlyFree textbook
  • Relies on AI to grade and teaches mainly textbook definitions
  • Students feel they learn little beyond what AI could provide
  • and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

, so an A is not easy.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content difficulty is low but teaching quality is the real problem.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Quality 2/5 and student says you might as well use AI instead of this class.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and .

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Group projects and remaining textbook work after short lectures.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Only covers definitions and 1-2 examples then leaves the rest to students.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assignments and .

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person business class felt like definition dumps with and little real teaching.

Main concern

Weak instruction and .

What students said

“He and rarely grades himself.”
Bus-071

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to learn this subject, might as well use AI instead. Practically the same teachings.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting weak teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“his teaching skills lack and only goes over textbook definitions and 1-2 examples”

🤖

28/100

“He and rarely grades himself.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“If you want to learn this subject, might as well use AI instead.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • only goes over textbook definitions and 1-2 examples
  • making you do all the remaining work
  • might as well use AI instead

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • B
  • His textbook

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Single detailed recent review with , but sample size is very low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

Bus-0711 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values