AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Ruth Bennington

ACCTM01 · ACCTM120 · ACCTM110M120 · ACCTM110ANDM120 · ACCTM110 · 94 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
88.75%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you will stay on top of homework; prefer full-semester in person over rushed online or PACE.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringLots of homeworkClear grading criteriaAmazing lecturesExtra credit
  • and strong support to succeed.
  • Workload is heavy especially in PACE, summer, and online McGraw Hill sections.
  • In person often praised for lectures and fair tests; online is doable but more busywork.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earn As and using study guides, but effort and consistency are required.

Online short terms feel harder for an A; full-term in person is more manageable.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Accounting concepts and volume make the course moderately hard even when teaching is strong.

In ; accelerated online raises it.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, while some online or flexible formats do not enforce it strictly.

In person more often requires showing up; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

89/100

About 89% would take again and most comments call her one of the .

In person love is strongest; a minority dislike online busywork or rare temperament issues.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and fair study-guide style exams help students who put in work.

Format shift

Online tests can feel harder and .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and frequent chapter work make the load heavy especially in short terms.

Format shift

PACE and summer online sections are the most overwhelming.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students repeatedly praise clear explanations, patience, accessibility, and genuine care for success.

Format shift

In person lectures are the standout; some online sections lack video lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

and non-cumulative tests or exams.

Format shift

Some online sections emphasize quizzes and tests more; in person balances lecture practice with exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person students call her a gem for patience, humor, and lectures that make accounting click.

Main concern

Material can still be hard and As.

What students said

“Prof. Bennington is a gem! , and funny.”
ACCTM120
“ .”
ACCTM120
“If you have to take accounting, 100% take it with this professor.”
ACCTM110

Remote format

Online

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online is , and tests; caring support but lots of tedious work.

Main concern

Busywork volume, textbook cost, and .

What students said

“Good amount of homework so just be ready for that”
ACCTM110
“omg the amount of ”
ACCTM01
“Do the work and you'll pass without a problem.”
ACCTM120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

guides, not free easy open-book free-for-alls overall.

Study guides like testsMcGraw Hill homeworkCanvas quizzes with multiple attemptsIn-person exams no notesTimed exams

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In and study guides, sometimes closed-note.

Study guides match testsIn-person examsPractice problems
“the and she will just test you based on whatever is on the ”
ACCTM120
“5 exams which must be taken in person and do not allow notes”
ACCTM120

Online

Online comments mention timed exams, fill-in and MC tests, and occasional open-materials quizzes.

Timed examsQuizzes with explanationsMcGraw HillSome open materials
“ and involve a high volume of material.”
ACCTM120
“Only saving grace was being allowed to use course materials while taking the test.”
ACCTM120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof. Bennington is a gem! , and funny.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting teaching strength and workload pressure. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Professor Bennington was honestly one of the .”

📚

32/100

“omg the amount of ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

89/100

“ !! (:”

❤️ Student Support

90/100

“She wants everyone to succeed and will definitely do all she can to make that happen.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • !
  • She uses the boards a lot to show how to do the problems
  • Her

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If , and , it will help immensely.
  • .
  • Must put in work to pass.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • there was so much busy work
  • Lots of homework questions for each chapter (30+)
  • , and lectures do not prepare you much for the exams.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

94

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews over many years show consistent praise for teaching with a .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 567
4 out of 515
3 out of 55
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ACCTM12026 reviews
ACCTM11017 reviews
ACCTM015 reviews
ACCTM110ANDM1201 review
ACCTM110M1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

35

A+ 6 · A 27 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1