AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Olga Myshina

NSLAB · NS17 · NS31 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
22.22%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid her online writing-heavy courses unless you already master APA and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderAPA ObsessedVague RubricsGroup ProjectsHarsh Online
  • Online nursing ethics courses are content-easy but , and APA-obsessed.
  • Many students report and heavy AI-detection scrutiny.
  • , with students praising rigor and real-world prep.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Content is often easy, but harsh APA-focused grading and effort and stress.

Online reviews drive the harsh-grade story; in-person students still call her tough but fairer.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students repeatedly say the nursing ethics material and ; the pain is the professor, not the concepts.

Both formats describe content as manageable; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Many online sections mark attendance optional or not required, while some weeks and .

Online evidence leans optional; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Roughly one in , and most recent online comments urge students to pick anyone else.

; older in-person clinical reviews are much more positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

; , and items not on the rubric.

Format shift

Harshness is concentrated in online writing courses; .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and APA on almost everything keep the load high.

Format shift

; in-person clinical rigor is different but still demanding.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students say , and grades inconsistently, despite a few strong clinical fans.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is rated poor; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and group projects more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online sections are paper- and project-heavy; one online review notes a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and clinical reviews are mostly positive, calling her passionate, thorough, and career-prep focused.

Main concern

High expectations and , but .

What students said

“I love Professor Myshina. if you want to actually learn”
NSLAB
“Her classes are stressful, but she prepares you for the real world.”
NSLAB
“Olga is an awesome nursing instructor... and become a better nurse!”
NS31

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and AI accusations despite easy content.

Main concern

and constant APA or AI penalties.

What students said

“Oh my . She is so stressful and annoying. Nothing is good enough for her.”
NS17
“ rubric.”
NS31
“Coursework itself is easy just the professor is horrible. Don't rec at all.”
NSLAB

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly papers and group projects; and are not clearly proctored in comments.

Group Project Midterm/FinalWeekly PapersAPA RequiredLimited Formal Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize tough standards and .

High StandardsClearer FeedbackClinical/Lab Focus
“She is a .”
NSLAB
“ ”
NSLAB

Online

Online assessments emphasize weekly papers, discussions, APA, group projects, and occasional tests; AI detection is a .

Weekly PapersGroup ProjectsAPA HeavyAI Detection Scrutiny
“Weekly short papers & only 1 do-able final test. 2 group projects.”
NS31
“Unless you wanna be accused of using ”
NS17

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Oh my . She is so stressful and annoying. Nothing is good enough for her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting online . Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ and instead gives us a link to find all the information ourselves.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“If .”

⚖️

18/100

“ rubric.”

📝 Workload Pain

35/100

“2 group projects and either a a week.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she wants

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not a difficult class but she grades really hard
  • Easy A if you follow instructions
  • Grades extremely hard

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • I love Professor Myshina
  • does not demonstrate any type of care for her students
  • She is a passionate lecturer

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

20 detailed reviews across 2022-2025 with consistent online complaints and a .

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 513

Course coverage

NS3114 reviews
NSLAB4 reviews
NS172 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

5

B 2 · B- 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1