AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Jennifer Danley-Scott

POLSM03 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you follow source rules closely; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardOrganized CanvasTough GraderReading HeavySpecific Sources RequiredMixed Feedback
  • , and some students call her lectures amazing.
  • news sources and prompts are required.
  • do the work on time and you can earn an A; fall behind or miss source rules and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Students who complete modules, discussions, and papers carefully report As, but strict source rules make high grades effort-sensitive.

Online positives describe A paths with consistent work; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Intro gov content is standard, but and .

Online reading load is the main friction; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

and self-paced modules; only a few accelerated sections require participation check-ins.

; and less documented.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

About half praise organization and lectures while , so fit depends on tolerance for rigid assignment rules.

Online reviews are polarized; sparse in-person comments lean cautious.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Multiple students report large point cuts for wrong sources or .

Format shift

and in person; some online sections still give detailed comments.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Modules, discussions, research papers, midterm, and final create .

Format shift

Online is reading and writing heavy; .

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

and some excellent lecture praise are offset by slow or unfair grading and .

Format shift

Online organization is the strength; in-person evidence is thin and mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and source-specific assignments more than pure exams.

Format shift

Online modules and papers dominate; midterm and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Limited , and unfair grader assistants.

Main concern

and tough grading on article-based work.

What students said

“ ”
POLSM03
“She was a . You have to use the right as specific of news article for each assignments.”
POLSM03

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students split between praise for , and zero-textbook access versus frustration over strict source rules and .

Main concern

Specific newspaper sources and complete.

What students said

“Professor Scott is hands down one of the course.”
POLSM03
“Very frustrated with .”
30608
“You have to use the specific newspaper sources she prefers, and if you don't she removes a huge chunk of your grade.”
73568

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment mixes a midterm and and module work; proctoring tools are not clearly described.

MidtermFinalModule QuizzesResearch PapersTurnitin

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly describe and lecture-heavy delivery.

Lecture HeavyArticle Assignments
“She was a . You have to use the right as specific of news article for each assignments.”
POLSM03

Online

Online students mention a midterm and and Turnitin papers; open-book or webcam rules are not clearly proven.

MidtermFinalDiscussion PostsTurnitin Papers
“4 modules, 1 month to do each module. Grades fast a couple research papers with turn-itin check, lost of discussion posts, miderm, 1 final.”
30608

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you do work, you will get an A!”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, mostly online political science sections. Credibility rating: Medium.

🗂️ Organization Strength

75/100

“Even for an accelerated class I did not feel heavily overwhelmed by the course work because and easy to click through.”

⚖️

34/100

“Very frustrated with . and she replied back "everything looks good". So not sure why my final grade was a 10/30.”

👍 When It Works

80/100

“Honestly great professor, leaves comments on everything! As long as you do work, you will get an A!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching & Structure

  • and easy to click through
  • And her lectures were amazing!
  • . .

Theme 2

📈

  • You have to use the specific newspaper sources she prefers
  • clearly gives unjustified low grades!

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • There is a huge amount of reading and the textbook is excruciatingly boring.
  • occasionally time consuming
  • Don't fall behind, stay on task.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine mostly recent reviews give decent detail but opinions are polarized and .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 50

Course coverage

POLSM034 reviews
306083 reviews
324791 review
735681 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1