AI Rate Professor

Psychology

John Dueppen

PSYM05 · PSYM01 · PSYMO5 · PSYMO1 · PSYCMO1 · M01 · PSY79895 · PSYCHM05 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can follow hyper-specific instructions, attend religiously, and grind journals for feedback.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTedious journalsLong monotone lecturesExtra credit availablePolarized reviews
  • Recent reviews call him impossible to please, condescending, and overly picky on journals.
  • , and lots of .
  • Attendance and detailed journal criteria are strict, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

helps, but tough journal criteria and .

Both formats report picky grading; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard psych with , and dense lectures rather than advanced theory.

Online adds very long recorded lectures; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Multiple reviews say miss about four classes and you are dropped; is often in-class only.

; online still requires watching long lectures.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Low take-again rate and a wave of .

Recent online and in-person comments are far .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Often labeled a and hyper-specific journal criteria.

Format shift

Harshness shows in both formats; can cushion scores if you use it.

Workload

Moderate

44/100

Weekly quizzes, journals, and long lectures create steady work without pure overwhelm for most.

Format shift

Online journals and multi-hour lectures increase perceived load.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Knows the material and gives structure, but many find him condescending, tedious, and hard to please.

Format shift

In-person older reviews are warmer; recent comments across formats are much colder.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of chapter quizzes, exams, and heavily weighted journal assignments with .

Format shift

Both .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Knowledgeable but often tough and formal; journals and if you show up.

Main concern

, and inconsistent journal grading.

What students said

“This man is impossible to please. He speaks condescendingly to students”
PSYM05
“He may not be extra friendly or funny, but what matters is that Dueppen is a GREAT professor.”
PSYCHM05
“If you miss class more than and he does not care what the excuse is.”
PSYCMO1

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Mixed to negative online experience with , and invasive exam software complaints.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“IMPOSSIBLEEE to please. nothing will make him happy.”
PSYM05
“Requires students to essentially install spyware on their computers in ”
PSYM05
“Even though they are long, you must watch the lectures to get a good grade.”
PSYM05

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and exams are frequent and detail-heavy, with .

Frequent quizzesFill-in-the-blankStudy guidesOnline proctoring softwareExtra credit

Assessment risk

Strict

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Weekly quizzes with MC and short answer or fill-ins; study guides help, but .

Weekly quizzesFill-in portionsStudy guidesPop quizzes
“The fill in the blank portions are tough so make sure you really understand what the chapters are all about.”
PSYMO5
“There are at lease 1 quiz a week, sometimes 2, and I'm not gonna lie, they're difficult if you don't know your material.”
M01

Online

At least one student reports required third-party monitoring software for exams; lectures are very long.

Third-party exam softwareLong recorded lectures
“Requires students to essentially install spyware on their computers in ”
PSYM05

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“IMPOSSIBLEEE to please. nothing will make him happy. he will never give you the benefit of the doubt.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, balancing recent harsh critiques with older praise of structure and . Credibility rating: High.

🧱 Impossible to Please

28/100

“Impossible to please. ”

📝

30/100

“ .”

🎁 Lifeline

70/100

“Prof. , and is also a fantastic teacher.”

🚫

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He speaks condescendingly to students
  • His lectures are long, repetitive, and difficult to sit through
  • He is definitely knowledgable in psychology.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • nothing you do in his class will ever be good enough
  • very easy to get a good grade in
  • have to work for an A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Rules and Tone

  • If you miss class more than
  • He would call you out in the middle of the class
  • install spyware on their computers in

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-three reviews over many years show a ; detail level is high though opinions are polarized.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 511

Course coverage

PSYM0511 reviews
PSYCHM056 reviews
PSYMO14 reviews
M013 reviews
PSYCMO13 reviews
Show 3 more courses
PSYM013 reviews
PSYMO52 reviews
PSY798951 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 6

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2