AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Milagros Ebuen

NSM01L · NSM04 · NSM03 · NS4 · NS1 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
84.62%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a rigorous, high-support clinical mentor who will push you; avoid if you need a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInspirational Clinical MentorPatient Safety AdvocateExtremely KnowledgeablePushes for ExcellencePolarizing Clinical Style
  • Most students call her an inspirational, highly skilled nursing clinical instructor.
  • She pushes hard for excellence and real-world competence, not comfort.
  • A small cluster of and public embarrassment.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many report A grades with her support, but she expects high clinical standards and will not hand out easy passes.

Almost all grade evidence is in person; the one online review still reported an A-.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Nursing clinical and lecture content is inherently demanding even when she teaches clearly.

and nursing courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Clinical and .

Both the online and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

The large , and mentorship despite a loud minority of detractors.

In-person recommendations dominate; the single .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and fair; critics claim unclear criteria and mood-based grades.

Format shift

Nearly all .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Clinical nursing work is substantial, with high expectations rather than busywork complaints.

Format shift

; most focus on clinical intensity.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most reviews describe exceptional clinical teaching, real-life examples, and deep expertise; a minority report harmful interactions.

Format shift

In-person praise is strong and detailed; the only online review is negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and course expectations rather than pure exam talk.

Format shift

Reviews rarely detail traditional exams; focus is clinical evaluation and teaching.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Overwhelmingly praised in clinical and lecture for , and mentoring, with a minority of severe complaints.

Main concern

A , and inconsistent grading.

What students said

“I would purposefully fail out of nursing school just .”
NSM01L
“Her theme is “no one is left behind” and is always advocating for us.”
NSM04
“She's beyond rude and will go out of her way to embarrass you in front of your peers and staff and clinical sites.”
NS1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is strongly negative, citing judgmental tone and a stressful nursing semester.

Main concern

Described as nagging, judgmental, and not a peaceful online learning environment.

What students said

“A big nag in the face, made nursing uncomfortable and straining... Unnecessarily judgemental and rude.”
NSM04

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize clinical performance and .

Clinical EvaluationSkills FeedbackPerformance Expectations

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence centers on clinical teaching and performance .

Clinical Skills EvaluationFormative Feedback
“She gives opportunities for her students to grow in the class or clinical setting and because she wants everyone to succeed.”
NSM04
“She will push you to ensure that you are not only a safe, but excellent nurse.”
NS4

Online

The single online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would purposefully fail out of nursing school just .”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting mentorship praise, clinical rigor, and polarized complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Inspirational Mentor

90/100

“Through my educational journey, Dr. Ebuen has became my true inspiration, a mother figure, and amazing person to look up to.”

🏥 Clinical Excellence

88/100

“Possibly the and may actually be a real-life superhero with her credentials.”

⚠️ Polarizing Intensity

40/100

“Grades based on her mood, very inconsistent. Shes beyond rude and will go out of her way to embarrass you”

👍

86/100

“I would take her again 100%. She is awesome!!”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character and Care

  • She is professional, encouraging, competent, and
  • She is always advocating for us and providing us with opportunities
  • She makes her students feel comfortable and safe in learning from their mistakes

Theme 2

👩‍⚕️ About Clinical Teaching

  • Professor Ebuen brings soooo much real life examples to her teachings
  • She went out of her way when we were struggling in lecture to teach us during clinical
  • She encourages growth and pushes you to be better

Theme 3

⚠️ About Criticisms

  • and she doesnt answer clarification questions
  • She expects students
  • Not a relaxing or peaceful teacher. Unnecessarily judgemental and rude

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-six reviews are detailed and recent enough, but opinions are polarized and only one is online, so confidence is medium.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

NSM0414 reviews
NS45 reviews
NS13 reviews
NSM01L2 reviews
NSM032 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 1 · A 16 · A- 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1