AI Rate Professor

Communication

Jill McCall

COMMM04 · INTERPERSONAL · COMM04 · COMMMO1 · COMMM01 · SPCHM01 · COM100 · COMM01 · 232 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
48%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can self-track a messy syllabus and tolerate late, opaque grading for an otherwise passable Comm class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedLate GradingUnclear InstructionsGroup ProjectsCaring but Inconsistent
  • Chronic late or
  • Assignment instructions and
  • Personality is warm for many, but

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many earn As if they follow rubrics and do the work, but and opaque criteria block a free A.

Online and in-person both allow As with effort, though .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content itself is often called not hard; confusion comes from structure more than concept difficulty.

Both formats say the class is manageable; online focuses on videos and group projects.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while many require participation and warn skipping hurts.

Online is ; in-person more often treats participation as required.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Near 48 percent would take again; recent reviews trend more .

; online centers on structure and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

and reports of zeros, regrades, and arbitrary criteria outweigh extra-credit help.

Format shift

Online students stress harsh completion standards; in-person stress delayed and .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Speeches, papers, group projects, and prep work add steady load without always feeling overwhelming.

Format shift

Online video discussions and group projects; in-person speeches and papers dominate.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

She can be caring, funny, and inspiring, yet , and disorganized.

Format shift

and worst-teacher extremes; online is more process complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Speeches, papers, videos, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize speeches and projects; few exam-heavy comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and arbitrary for many others.

Main concern

, and group projects create stress despite a manageable content load.

What students said

“The .”
COMM04
“her classes made me love the subject!”
INTERPERSONAL
“Public speaking is a terrifying class and she made it not scary at all”
COMM01

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and video or group tasks that are passable if you self-manage.

Main concern

Grades often appear at the end, so you cannot course-correct mid-term.

What students said

“She doesn't grade anything until the end, which is annoying.”
COMM04
“Her instructions are so confusing.”
COMM04
“she typically grades 2-3 weeks later which means your grade could go from an A to a D super quick”
COMM01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on speeches, papers, and .

Speech-focusedFew quizzesProject-basedRubric-driven

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and personal assignments with occasional quizzes.

Personal presentationsSpeechesOccasional quizzes
“ because of the fires but as long as .”
COMM04
“Several quizzes and a couple presentations.”
COMMM04

Online

Online work is mainly discussion videos, group projects, and speeches with .

Video discussionsGroup projectsSpeeches
“The main focus is making videos for discussions and a group project”
COMM04

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She never graded anything till after the semester was over and if you asked her shes rude.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🗂️ Organization Crisis

30/100

“The .”

⏳ Grade Blackout

35/100

“She does not grade anything until the very end of class.”

❤️

70/100

“her classes made me love the subject! Yes there is a lot of writing but that only prepares you if you want to peruse a bachelors.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and constantly goes off on tangents
  • She is an amazing teacher and relates to her students
  • Ironic that she is a communications teacher...

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She doesn't grade anything until the end, which is annoying
  • Not a hard class, but the professor doesn't grade until the end
  • She is a . She won't even give u credit for completion.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Jill is one of the most charming people I've ever met
  • but she is very passive aggressive
  • genuinely cares for students and wants them to learn the curriculum!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

232

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews across years with recurring organization and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5121
4 out of 543
3 out of 529
2 out of 518
1 out of 522

Course coverage

COMM0423 reviews
COMM0115 reviews
COMMM015 reviews
COM1002 reviews
COMMM042 reviews
Show 3 more courses
COMMMO11 review
INTERPERSONAL1 review
SPCHM011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 4 · A 18 · A- 2

B range

9

B+ 6 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 6