AI Rate Professor

English

Jeffrey Sosner

ENGLM01A · ENGLM01B · ENGM01B · ENGLISHM01B · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
88.89%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you will do the reading and ; skip if you want a free A with no effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilarious and caringClear grading criteriaLots of readingGives good feedbackEssay focused
  • Funny, caring English professor who gives clear rubrics and
  • Easy A if you read, attend, and follow his specific writing criteria
  • A minority call him a , but

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Many call it an easy A if you read and follow rubrics, but some need strong writing skills and call him a .

In-person reviews dominate; the one online review also supports an A with timely work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is approachable for college English, but and .

and essays as the main work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Most students report and warn that skipping makes it easy to fall behind.

In-person evidence is clearer; as not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Nearly 90% would take again, calling him funny, fair, and one of the .

Strong in-person consensus; the single online review is also highly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and good feedback help most students, though a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect lots of reading, journal entries, and .

Format shift

Workload pattern is consistent across formats.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students praise engaging lectures, humor, patience, and willingness to help them improve writing.

Format shift

Positive teaching tone holds online and in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Grade centers on four essays with rubrics, plus reading-based work; exams appear less often.

Format shift

Essay focus is consistent; and final MC plus short essays.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students mostly love his humor, feedback, and support, while , and .

Main concern

A few students found essay grading harsh or disliked political digressions.

What students said

“as long as you read the book and attend the lectures you'll get an A.”
ENGLM01A
“It's an easy A if you put in the work. Great teacher!!”
ENGLM01A
“He was a and don't expect to get an A in the class unless English is one of your strongest subjects.”
ENGLM01A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is strongly positive: , and a .

Main concern

Only one online sample, so online experience is less proven.

What students said

“I loved his class! He really cares about his students!He is always willing to help and his dad jokes are hilarious!”
ENGLM01A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; a few sections add midterm and final exams with MC and short essays.

Essay-focused gradingClear rubricsSome midterm and final examsReading-based prompts

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In and reading; some students report a midterm and and short essay prompts.

Four essaysClear rubricsMidterm and final in some sectionsReading heavy
“Also, a midterm and a final with 50 multiple choice questions and 2 short essay prompts.”
ENGLM01A
“There are 4 essays with , and he is always willing to answer any questions.”
ENGLM01A

Online

Online reviews emphasize four essays, journal entries, and .

Four essaysJournal entriesClear grading criteria
“We and one of them is a research essay.”
ENGLM01A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Sosner is genuinely one of the . He really gives you every tool needed to succeed and changes his classes based off of how much help students need.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews (26 in person, 1 online), highlighting humor, essays, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“He's also very funny and keeps students engaged. if !”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“100% would take him again if i could.”

📖 Reading and Essays

48/100

“ ”

⚖️

62/100

“as long as you know what you're talking about he's a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and FAIR professor
  • engaging lectures
  • super chill and very easy to follow

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • easy A if you put in the work
  • Show up to class and put in the work and it's an easy A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He cares about his students and will help as much as he can
  • , and funny
  • super open for as many questions as you need

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

27 reviews over several years with rich detail and mostly consistent praise, tempered by a .

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGLM01A21 reviews
ENGM01B3 reviews
ENGLM01B2 reviews
ENGLISHM01B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 3 · A 13

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 2