AI Rate Professor

Art History

Juliet Moss

ARTHM001 · ART112 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid if you can; students , and a poor interpersonal experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderSo many papersLots of homeworkPassive aggressiveEarly due times
  • Heavy writing load with many papers, quizzes, and strict no-late-work rules
  • Several students report disrespectful tone, passive aggression, or an AI-cheating accusation ruse
  • Only one older positive review;

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and no late work make an A difficult even when content is not described as brilliant.

Negative grade-effort tone appears online and in person; one older .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Work is not described as conceptually impossible, but volume of , and strict policies make it hard.

Both formats emphasize heavy writing rather than pure conceptual difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Reviews consistently list attendance as .

and in person.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Only about 20% would take again; most tell others to save themselves and .

and in person, aside from one older positive online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and stories of rigid criteria, zeros for deadlines, and false AI accusations dominate recent reviews.

Format shift

One older .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students report many essays, quizzes, reading, and early 8 pm due times with no late submissions.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Recent students call lectures unhelpful, tone disrespectful, and interactions passive aggressive.

Format shift

In-person complaints focus on tone; online complaints focus on unhelpful answers.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

, and reading work more than a single final exam style.

Format shift

Paper and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

times, passive aggression, and a serious trust issue over a false AI-cheating claim.

Main concern

Strict no-late policy and disrespectful interactions.

What students said

“She also is very passive aggressive at times.”
ART112
“She has falsely accused me of cheating by using AI and later admitted it to be only a ruse to get me to attend office hours.”
ART112

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly negative , and paper load, with one older hybrid review calling her generous.

Main concern

Unhelpful online help and heavy writing with early due times.

What students said

“The biggest mistake any student makes during their education is choosing this professor to ruin your educational path.”
ART112
“each time she would encourage someone to ask a question she would only respond with "read the etext" or "really read the prompt"”
ART112
“This professor is very generous and she gave us an quiz.”
ARTHM001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe heavy papers and and no make-ups; proctoring tools are not clearly described.

Test heavyMany papersNo late workStrict deadlines

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes with no late work and early 8 pm due times, without detailing exam software.

Lots of essays and quizzesNo late workDue at 8 pm
“She assigns lots of essays and quizzes. They're not hard but it's just a lot.”
ART112
“She does not allow you to make up any work or turn in anything late.”
ART112

Online

Online reviews mention test-heavy and paper-heavy work but do not clearly prove webcam or .

Test heavySo many papersRead the etext responses
“ , So ”
ART112
“she would only respond with "read the etext" or "really read the prompt"”
ART112

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Save yourself. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (3 online, 2 in , and interpersonal concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“Very difficult professor to get along with.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“The biggest mistake any student makes during their education is choosing this professor to ruin your educational path.”

📄 Paper Overload

24/100

“She assigns lots of essays and quizzes. They're not hard but it's just a lot.”

⚖️ Trust and Tone

15/100

“She has falsely accused me of cheating by using AI and later admitted it to be only a ruse to get me to attend office hours.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • low key annoying
  • passive aggressive at times

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • So many papers
  • does not allow you to make up any work or turn in anything late

Theme 3

⚠️ About Experience

  • Save yourself. .
  • falsely accused me of cheating by using AI
  • due at 8 pm instead of 11:59 pm

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 reviews with mixed eras, but recent comments are detailed and consistently negative, supporting a cautious low overall score.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART1124 reviews
ARTHM0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values