AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Autumn Muntz Olsen

NSM01L · NS3 · NS03 · NS3P1 · NS2P2 · NSM25 · NSNS1 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

if you want rigorous clinical patho training and ; avoid if you need an easy or gentle instructor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderPatho Heavy ClinicalPolarizing FeedbackHarsh ExpectationsHigh-Stakes Assignments
  • Clinical students split hard between caring patho mentor and belittling critic
  • Theory and online NSM25 reviews , and high-stakes work
  • As are possible but require heavy effort and perfect alignment with

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

As appear on transcripts, but comments stress harsh rubrics, few high-weight items, and constant push just to keep full credit.

Online reviews emphasize nitpicky docks with ; clinical grades can still be high if you absorb blunt patho coaching.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

, and high clinical standards make the content intellectually demanding.

Both formats rate difficulty high; online adds dense reading and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Clinical and many theory sections mark attendance as .

as required; online mixed but .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Would-take-again sits near 43% with love-or-hate clinical feedback and .

Positive clinical mentors balance online and theory reviews that .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tough grader tags and comments and online reviews.

Format shift

Online is especially nitpicky; some if effort shows.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Heavy reading, high-stakes sparse assignments, journals, care plans, and patho prep create sustained stress.

Format shift

; clinical daily journals and care plans add ongoing load.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Quality ratings polarize between clear caring clinical mentor and .

Format shift

In-person clinical praise is stronger; online lectures and .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of clinical journals and care plans with theory exams, discussions, papers, and high-weight assignments.

Format shift

; clinical leans ongoing written clinical work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person clinicals are patho-heavy and high-pressure: and support, while others report belittling comments and .

Main concern

Inconsistent .

What students said

“She's exactly the type of professor an NS1 needs to build a strong foundation in clinicals.”
NSM01L
“Absolutely horrifying experience. Constantly belittles students... Made many of us cry.”
NS2P2
“ and supportive and loves when you ask questions.”
NS2P2

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online NSM25 is reading-heavy with timed no-backtrack exams, few high-weight assignments, and frequent complaints of .

Main concern

and timed exams that block answer changes.

What students said

“ SO much and and barely any feedback.”
NSM25
“She gives you timed exams, where you cant go back once you answer a question.”
NSM25
“Autumn is the ... just to get 2 points off with !”
NSM25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; clinical evaluation is continuous and exacting.

Timed ExamsNo Answer ReviewTest HeavyAPA PapersClinical Evaluations

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person clinicals emphasize continuous journals, care plans, and patho knowledge with .

Clinical EvaluationsCare PlansDaily JournalsPatho Focus
“Multiple comments on Daily Journals and on the Care Plan simply insulted the student for making a mistake”
NS2P2
“You will need to know your pathosphysiology for this clinical professor.”
NSM01L

Online

Online NSM25 uses timed exams that prevent revisiting .

Timed ExamsCannot Go BackFew High-Weight AssignmentsHarsh Paper Grading
“The exams don't allow you to go back and change your answer - if ”
NSM25
“She gives you timed exams, where you cant go back once you answer a question.”
NSM25

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Absolutely horrifying experience. Constantly belittles students. Doesn't state her expectations... Made many of us cry.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews spanning clinical and online nursing courses, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She is so intelligent and puts a heavier emphasis on patho than any other clinical instructor, however, ”

⚖️

22/100

“Autumn is the ... just to get 2 points off with !”

👍 Recommendation Rate

42/100

“ unless you have to.”

📚 Workload Intensity

28/100

“way too much reading and so .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Learned a ton from Professor Muntz. and in clinical.
  • Insufferable
  • She is really hard, but she tells you everything you need to know for the tests.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to really push to get an A.
  • This was the . Extremely hard and I dropped last minute.
  • Be prepared to put in your time studying the material.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Super kind and .
  • she is just mean and will treat you like an idiot.
  • Constantly belittles students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

19 detailed reviews across 2010-2025 with consistent themes of , and polarized clinical personality.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

NSM258 reviews
NS2P24 reviews
NSM01L2 reviews
NSNS12 reviews
NS031 review
Show 2 more courses
NS31 review
NS3P11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1