AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Jamee Maxey-D'Angelo

NS4L · NSM17 · M17 · NS4 · NS1L · NS1 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
21.74%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid if you have another option; if , and need the course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderUnclear InstructionsSelf-Taught CourseHarsh FeedbackHeavy Workload
  • Most students report and .
  • Many say you teach yourself from the textbook with late grades and slow or .
  • A few clinical students praise her rigor and feedback, but ethics and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Many students still earn As or Bs, but and rarely gives full credit without heavy effort.

Both online and ; online adds more complaints about late grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and group work, so the experience feels harder than the subject needs to be.

Online comments emphasize self-teaching; in-person clinicals feel rigorous but more instructional for some.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

In-person and , while several online sections do not require it.

In-person is usually mandatory; online is mixed and often not required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students warn others , and a dismissive tone, with only a minority recommending her.

; rare positive notes cluster in clinical courses.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students repeatedly call her a and rarely awards full points.

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Weekly papers, discussions, group projects, and students.

Format shift

Online ethics courses especially report 2+ page papers and multiple discussions each week.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

, and , though a few clinical students found her helpful.

Format shift

Online lecture-style courses score worse than a few in-person clinical experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and papers rather than traditional exams alone.

Format shift

and group assignment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

many call her rude and demoralizing in lecture, while a few clinical students value the challenge and feedback.

Main concern

Rude or dismissive tone plus tough grading and .

What students said

“I have never encountered a more arrogant, self indulgent professor in my life. ”
M17
“The wicked witch of Moorpark college. if you can.”
NS4
“She WILL challenge you! If you want to become a great nurse DO NOT HESITATE.”
NS4L

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections feel self-taught with vague prompts, heavy papers and , and .

Main concern

and and tiny errors with little teaching support.

What students said

“She made this class way more difficult than it had to be. Is an and critiques the smallest things.”
NSM17
“There is ; you have to teach yourself. .”
M17
“Horrible professor. Not a difficult class, but she makes it more complicated than necessary.”
NSM17

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe assignment-heavy assessment with , and group work; proctoring is not clearly detailed.

Final Test Plus EssayGroup AssignmentAssignment Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and clinical evaluation than on a clearly described exam proctoring policy.

PapersClinical EvaluationGroup Projects
“ and most learning is self-guided through the textbook. Expect multiple essays with significant time investment.”
NSM17

Online

Online finals are described as a test, essay, and ; proctoring tools are not clearly proven.

Final TestEssayGroup AssignmentWeekly Papers
“ and a group assignment. .”
M17

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews spanning online and and self-taught workload. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

28/100

“Doesnt teach well at all. either.”

📉 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“ ”

✂️

22/100

“Is an and critiques the smallest things.”

📚

25/100

“There is ; you have to teach yourself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • There is ; you have to teach yourself.
  • and most learning is self-guided through the textbook.
  • The professor knows her subject well but it doesnt translate into teaching well.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Everything you turn in has to be perfected; .
  • She grades very strict, I remember I got marked down a .
  • I got marked down a .

Theme 3

💬 About Tone and Support

  • She is rude & purposely ignores specific questions in
  • A lot of students tried emailing her with no response.
  • Shes an awful person, not supportive to nursing students, horrible attitude, rude.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

25 detailed reviews spanning 2016-2026 show and and in-person formats.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 516

Course coverage

NSM1712 reviews
M177 reviews
NS43 reviews
NS11 review
NS1L1 review
Show 1 more courses
NS4L1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 5 · A- 3

B range

9

B+ 6 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1