AI Rate Professor

Education

Rene Conrad

CDM07 · CD03 · CD25 · CDM25 · ECEM013 · CDPROG · MUSICECE · CD11 · MUSICINECE · CHILDDEVELOPME · CDMO3 · CD23 · ECEMUSI · CDM02 · CHLDFMCOM · CDM23 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you like interactive classes, but be ready for and strong opinions.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring ECE mentorGroup projects heavyCan be condescendingClear expectations when likedPolarizing recent reviews
  • , and practical learning.
  • A minority, including the only recent online review, call her snarky, biased, or tough.
  • work and can handle group projects.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Several students call the class doable or easy with effort, but tough-grader and .

The lone online review is much tougher; most easier-A .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Workload looks heavy at first but is , and activities.

In-person evidence dominates; the online review calls the course lecture-heavy and harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

and in-class journals, so missing class can hurt.

Attendance comments .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Strong older endorsements clash with and sharp recent criticism.

; the single online review is a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Clear criteria and appear in positive reviews, while others report tough or .

Format shift

Online review emphasizes unclear rubrics; .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Group projects, activities, and readings add up, though many students say the load becomes manageable.

Format shift

; the online review also flags lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

Many students praise preparation, caring support, and useful ECE activities despite recurring complaints about condescension.

Format shift

online critique.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and tests rather than one single assessment mode.

Format shift

Both formats mention projects and tests; in-person leans more group-activity based.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Mostly positive historical in-person record with , and doable workload when expectations are followed.

Main concern

Some students feel condescended to or pressured to align with her preferences.

What students said

“Renee cares about her students and goes out of her way to help them not only academically but also personally.”
CDM25
“Great professor! An easy class that I learned a lot from! !!!”
CDM23
“However is condescending and borderline rude to some students when presenting projects.”
CDM23

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Single recent online review is strongly negative , and snarky comments.

Main concern

Perceived bias and mismatch between lectures and .

What students said

“Very liberal class and if you even show any sort of opinion that does not match hers, she'll just give you a bad grade.”
CDM23

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on projects and class activities with standard tests; no strong evidence of open-book or proctored software.

Group projectsIn-class activitiesPowerPoint lecturesTests from bookUnclear online rubrics

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and book-based tests with limited exam-policy detail.

Group projectsIn-class activitiesBook-based testsExtra credit
“A lot to learn and interesting projects.”
CDM23
“took her in summer and got an easy A.. .”
CDM02

Online

One online review says lectures do not match tests and .

Unclear rubricsLecture-test mismatchSnarky grading comments
“The lectures don't match the test. . Also very snarky and rude in grading comments.”
CDM23

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, balancing strong older ECE praise with sharper recent criticism. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“Renee is an amazing teacher who always comes prepared for class.”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“Listen to the bad reviews!!!!!!!”

❤️ Student Support

70/100

“From the first day Renee was there to welcome and support me.”

⚠️ Tone Concerns

40/100

“she is very condesending toward students she doesn't care for.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She spells everything out.
  • Liked the class discussions and activities that went along with short powerpoint lectures.
  • She mostly reads from a and then makes you get into groups.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • An easy class that I learned a lot from!
  • If you do the work you will undoubtedly get an A.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is so caring and supportive to all her students.
  • If she dosent like you. She will make your time in her class HELL.
  • Nice lady, but you really have to suck up.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

25 reviews are enough for a directional read, but many are old and grade data is thin, with only one online review.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CD114 reviews
CDM234 reviews
CD232 reviews
CDMO32 reviews
MUSICINECE2 reviews
Show 11 more courses
CD031 review
CD251 review
CDM021 review
CDM071 review
CDM251 review
CDPROG1 review
CHILDDEVELOPME1 review
CHLDFMCOM1 review
ECEM0131 review
ECEMUSI1 review
MUSICECE1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values