AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Claudia Gutierrez

MATHM25A · MATHM15 · M07 · MATH70120 · MATHM03 · MATH16A · M03 · M08 · M15 · M25A · MATHM07 · M05 · M16A · 52 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
16.98%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Do not take her math class unless you have no alternative and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTests unlike homeworkTeach yourselfTough graderEndless adaptive HWUnresponsive emails
  • Dominant theme is exams that .
  • Students report heavy busywork, slow email replies, disorganization, and .
  • A few older or highly motivated students found her fair if they lived in office hours, but most advise running.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Even strong students report B, C, D, F, or drop because harsh exams dominate and small errors cost heavily.

Both online and ; few positive A stories exist.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

, and self-teaching make the experience feel extreme.

Calc and precalc online feel especially brutal; in-person stats and algebra face the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Some sections demand attendance and punish skips, while but still push workshops and quizzes.

; many online sections list attendance no.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

17/100

Would-take-again is about 17 percent, and the loud majority says pick anyone else.

and in person across recent years.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

; arithmetic mistakes, notation, and .

Format shift

Harsh grading is reported in both online adaptive courses and .

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

, and multi-hour weekly work are common complaints.

Format shift

Online Knewton-style adaptive work is called endless; and pop quizzes.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most say she cannot teach clearly, arrives late, leans on videos, and leaves students to self-study.

Format shift

A few older reviews call her kind or knowledgeable, but .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

and quizzes, with homework prep that students say does not match the exams.

Format shift

Online and and weak homework-to-exam alignment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students describe late , and weak classroom teaching.

Main concern

from class content and homework.

What students said

“ .”
M07
“What she teaches is nowhere near whats on the test. Test are worth 67%”
M25A
“Seriously one of if not the .”
M15

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews slam adaptive homework that , and forced self-study.

Main concern

Fully online listings sometimes still require on-ground testing with little notice.

What students said

“ur basically expected to teach yourself pre-calc.”
M07
“The , making it impossible to get an A even if you understand everything.”
M25A
“Enrolled in a fully online course, but surprised by mandatory on ground testing with little-no prior notice.”
M16A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and are widely described as harder, different, and unforgiving compared with practice.

Tests unlike homeworkTest heavyPop quizzesConceptual exam questionsOn-ground testing for some online sections

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and and study guides, with tests often majority weight.

Pop quizzesTests nothing like study guideTest heavy grade shareStrict no-calculator or harsh partial credit
“ .”
M07
“the shown us.”
M25A
“Your grade is made up of only tests and quizzes and she is a .”
MATHM07

Online

Online students report filmed or on-ground tests, multi-week unit pacing, and .

On-ground testing surpriseAdaptive homework mismatchFilmed testsSlow grading
“3 tests & filmed (& testing ).”
M07
“ ”
M25A
“ lectures or assignments”
MATHM25A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 math reviews with and . Credibility rating: High.

📉

15/100

“ .”

🚫 Recommendation

17/100

“TBH pick another prof”

📚 Workload Crush

15/100

“The . Even with .”

📧 Communication Gaps

20/100

“This teacher never replies to emails, would take like over a week or two to answer anything”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • ur basically expected to teach yourself pre-calc
  • she does not teach or
  • Her lectures are extremely boring, and her teaching is borderline useless.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • making it impossible to get an A even if you understand everything
  • I have a 4.0 GPA ... and I had to drop the class for the sake of my GPA
  • Test are worth 67%

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization & Support

  • and there is no learning to be done in that class
  • She would show up late to every class.
  • surprised by mandatory on ground testing with little-no prior notice.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

52

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years show , and low success rates.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 57
1 out of 534

Course coverage

M25A13 reviews
M157 reviews
M076 reviews
MATHM25A5 reviews
M16A3 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATHM073 reviews
MATHM153 reviews
M052 reviews
M082 reviews
MATH16A2 reviews
MATHM032 reviews
M031 review
MATH701201 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 2 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

8

C+ 2 · C 5 · C- 1

D range

4

D+ 2 · D 2

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

16

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 10 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4