AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Raymie Iadevaia

M30 · ARTM30 · M31 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you can; online is a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing Art ProfCopy-Paste FeedbackWeekly ProjectsMandatory Attendance In PersonTough Grader Online
  • some love weekly projects, others call him disengaged with .
  • In-person students describe a and participation drive the grade.
  • Expect lots of , and uneven grading comments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is possible with steady weekly projects, but and .

In-person reviews sound easier if you attend; online reviews .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, but weekly drawing load and materials make it feel demanding.

Online students stress more busywork; in-person students call content beginner-friendly.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and tags say skip class and you will not pass.

In-person clearly mandatory; but still often marked yes.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

About half love the projects and support; recent online reviews strongly warn others to run.

In-person lean positive; online is sharply split with recent 1-star experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Multiple students call him a .

Format shift

Online reviews drive the strict perception; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Projects due weekly, practice leading into larger pieces, and as lots of work.

Format shift

Heavy load appears in both formats; online adds complaints about unhelpful exercises.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some students praise clear criteria and tutorials; others say he is disengaged with outdated lectures.

Format shift

In-person teaching praised more; online quality scores swing between 5 and 1.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grade and final drawings, plus participation rather than written exams.

Format shift

Both formats center studio projects; exams are drawing-based deadlines.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person studio feels warm and and and participation.

Main concern

and long, slow class pace; missing class hurts.

What students said

“Raymie is such a sweet and lovely professor!!”
M30
“This professor is gold.”
ARTM30
“Show up, put in minimal effort and you'll pass guaranteed B.”
ARTM30

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

weekly projects and some detailed feedback for fans, but others , and .

Main concern

, and feeling the professor does not care.

What students said

“RUN AWAY!”
ARTM30
“He copies and pastes the same pre-written paragraphs from who knows how long ago as "feedback."”
M31
“ !”
M31

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and and limited time pressure comments.

Weekly ProjectsMidterm and Final DrawingsParticipation WeightedStudio Critique Style

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and clear studio expectations rather than written tests.

Attendance CriticalParticipation HeavyClear Studio Criteria
“The majority of your grade is class participation and attendance.”
ARTM30
“ work”
M30

Online

Online midterms and finals get decent time windows, but and .

Weekly ProjectsMidterm and FinalRecycled Written Feedback
“Also gives you plenty of and finals.”
M31
“It was very frustrating to turn in receive full credit.”
M31

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This man is not a good teacher. I hate art because of him. RUN AWAY!”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 Fine Arts reviews, balancing recent online complaints with . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“He creates a welcoming and inviting atmosphere from day 1.”

⚠️ Online Red Flag

20/100

“ and pasted from years back.”

📦 Workload

28/100

“There's a so space out your time.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • sweet and lovely professor
  • uses 7-year-old lectures that are pre-recorded
  • gives great tutorials

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Show up, put in minimal effort and you'll pass guaranteed B
  • never receive full credit

Theme 3

📦 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • Homework takes 2-5 hours per week

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only 8 reviews with strong polarity and older in-person praise versus recent online anger reduce confidence.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ARTM304 reviews
M313 reviews
M301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values