AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Beverly Gunderson

MATHM16A · MATHM15 · M03 · MATHM05 · MATHM07 · MATHM10 · MATHM11 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Only take her if and stay ahead; expect and uneven organization.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMyMathLab DependentTest HeavyMixed OrganizationPartial Credit HelperPace Class Grind
  • and students who call her disorganized or harsh
  • and
  • Online quality swings from fine stats support to no real lectures

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Many earn A grades with full MyMathLab scores and partial credit, but and organization issues block a free ride.

Online stats can feel easier; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Content difficulty is normal college math or calc, but rushed lectures and heavy testing raise the challenge.

; some online stats feel lighter if you use StatCrunch well.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

while ; flipped video-before-class setups still reward showing up.

Mixed signals across both online and in-person sections.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

; strong applied-calc fans clash with .

Slightly warmer for some online stats and in-person applied calc; colder for .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Partial credit and , but some call tests impossible and .

Format shift

Applied calc in person leans more lenient; a few courses feel harsh.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Frequent MyMathLab homework, weekly quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online 8-week pace is especially crushing.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and kind; others say she rushes, clears her throat constantly, and .

Format shift

Applied calc in person rates higher than several other courses.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Four chapter exams plus cumulative final are and quizzes.

Format shift

Both formats are test heavy; online still hinges on platform quizzes and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Applied and partial credit; others slam impossible tests, throat-clearing, and .

Main concern

Time mismanagement can stack hard exams with no study window before the final.

What students said

“She is the best Applied Calc 1 professor at Moorpark. and .”
MATHM16A
“She is so incredibly bad at time management that she so far that she gave my class NO TIME to prepare”
MATHM11
“honestly one of the . .”
MATHM10

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some stats students find recorded notes workable, others say she posts random internet videos and overloads 8-week terms.

Main concern

Weak original lectures and .

What students said

“The recorded lectures and and never too long.”
MATHM15
“ . Doesn't provide lectures and instead gives videos from the internet”
MATHM07
“If 10+ assignments per week.”
MATHM05

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard closed-style chapter exams dominate; reviews exist but time crunches and typos hurt prep.

Four exams plus finalMyMathLab testsPartial creditExam reviews with typos

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and sometimes stacked late; partial credit helps when work is shown.

Four chapter examsCumulative finalPartial creditExtra credit on exams
“ and a final,which is cumulative.”
MATHM16A
“She will give you some partial credit on the exams if you know what you're doing”
MATHM16A

Online

and are described as moderate if you know the tools.

Platform-based testsWeekly quizzesThree attempts on some quizzes
“ as hw and not too difficult.”
MATHM15
“There was at least 1 quiz a week that you have 3 attempts at and 1 test every other week that .”
MATHM05

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is the best Applied Calc 1 professor at Moorpark. and . The tests were not difficult and she gives partial credit.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews with mixed polarity across formats. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Professor Gunderson is a great professor and .”

📉 Organization Risk

35/100

“She is so incredibly bad at time management that she so far that she gave my class NO TIME to prepare or study for the .”

📚 Workload Load

32/100

“If 10+ assignments per week.”

👍 Recommendation Split

55/100

“ !! Need to watch videos BEFORE class so that you can ask questions and work on it during class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and
  • She rushes through her lectures and doesn't answer questions clearly
  • The recorded lectures and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Doing well on the
  • Almost every exam gave between 6% - 10%

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • she did come across as
  • she so far that she gave my class NO TIME to prepare
  • Some of the problems she gives us include concepts from future sections

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only fifteen reviews with polarized views and limited recent detail keep confidence at medium.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATHM153 reviews
MATHM16A3 reviews
M032 reviews
MATHM052 reviews
MATHM072 reviews
Show 2 more courses
MATHM112 reviews
MATHM101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1