AI Rate Professor

English

Luis Agregan

ENGM01A · ENG1A · 31516M01 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
6.67%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

unless you have no other English option and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderDemeaning FeedbackAI AccusationsHeavy Paper LoadUnprofessional Tone
  • Nearly every review rates him a 1 for quality with .
  • Students report frequent AI cheating accusations and little grace for late or personal issues.
  • In-person sections also flag uncomfortable comments about gender and ethnicity.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students say he and starts many writers below their target no matter the effort.

Both online and ; online adds AI accusations that tank scores.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and high standards make the course content and pace demanding for a transfer English class.

Online reviews stress unrealistic discussion length; and reading.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Online sections treat attendance as non-mandatory, but and call out absences.

; in-person evidence repeatedly says it is mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

, and many urge others to find any other English professor.

and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Tags and comments repeatedly call him a and .

Format shift

; online also includes AI-related grade fights.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Lots of homework, so many papers, and multi-dozen sentence discussions create an exhausting writing load.

Format shift

Online workload centers on discussions; and reading.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

, and a hostile climate that overshadows any course content.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize rude written comments; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and papers rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and mandatory attendance, with several reports of uncomfortable personal comments and intolerance of differing views.

Main concern

Classroom climate and readings.

What students said

“He made many uncomfortable comments to several of my classmates around their gender and/or ethnicity.”
ENGM01A
“He made me uncomfortable during the term and always asked the girls if they were married.”
ENGM01A
“The moment you have different taughts or try to defend your believes you'll pay it in class an on your grade.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online English sections are widely called unfair, with huge weekly discussion minimums, vague rude comments, and repeated AI accusations that .

Main concern

Unrealistic writing volume plus demeaning grading that many students cannot satisfy no matter the effort.

What students said

“He expects 40-48 sentences for a .”
ENGM01A
“He accused me of cheating and using AI MULTIPLE TIMES, even though I hadn't done so.”
ENGM01A
“He grades your work sarcastically and makes fun of you when you don't understand the assignment.”
31516M01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on papers and policies.

Essay-heavy assessmentDiscussion postsLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation more than formal exam rules.

Paper gradingParticipation mattersFew clear exam rules
“the only thing your graded on is papers which he starts everyone at a B and you have to go up or down from there.”
ENGM01A
“You do a lot of writing in this class and some of the but the .”
ENGM01A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or ; and discussions.

Discussion postsEssay gradingAI accusation disputes
“He consistently accuses students of AI even if they've spent hours writing a paper.”
ENGM01A
“ and never gives an A .”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I don't even know where to start with this teacher, he is actually the life.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting harsh grading, heavy writing, and climate concerns. Credibility rating: High.

💀 Teaching Quality

15/100

“The while. Leaves very rude comments on graded work and makes class really unmotivating.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ and .”

📝

12/100

“I can't ever meet his expectations or his standards no matter how much effort and time are put into the assignments.”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“There was a lot of writing and it was excruciating.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Loves to demean students work.
  • Very rude I turned in
  • and accusatory at times

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • never gives an A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • He made many uncomfortable comments to several of my classmates around their gender and/or ethnicity.
  • always asked the girls if they were married
  • Sexist jokes are told.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen recent detailed reviews from 2019-2025 show highly and workload.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ENGM01A11 reviews
ENG1A3 reviews
31516M011 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 5