Marcos Enriquez

MATHM25A · M07 · MATH25C · STATM15 · MATH25A · CALC25B · MATH05 · MATH15 · 25B · CALCM25B · MATHM31 · M25B · STATISTICS · M15STATISTICS · STATS · M31LINEARALG · COLALMO5 · MATHM25B · M15 · MATHM07 · MATHMO1 · MATH70754 · MATHM15 · CALCM25A · CALC · 239 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 24/100
RMP rating: 2.4/5
Take again: 29.73%
Difficulty: 3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material well and can teach yourself; better options exist for most students.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderPoor CommunicationTest HeavyUnorganized LecturesSelf-Teach Risk

Many students report , ignored emails, and
Grades lean heavily on quizzes and
Online sections draw especially severe complaints about isolation and AI proctoring

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even students , and little room for error on exams.

Online students report the hardest path to good grades; some in-person stats students find a clearer path if they attend.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

26/100

Calc and related courses feel fast, abstract, and poorly scaffolded for many learners.

In-person stats can feel more manageable; online calc is repeatedly called the hardest version.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Multiple reviews , and participation is expected.

; online still expects engagement and some required sessions.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Only about three in stay away.

; in-person has a small group of defenders but remains mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students frequently report points lost for format, limited partial credit, and .

Format shift

calc tests.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Knewton Alta or , and high-stakes testing create a heavy load.

Format shift

Online homework volume and .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Common themes are unorganized lectures, board mistakes, skipped steps, and .

Format shift

A few in-person students say he teaches by working problems well; online teaching is widely panned.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

84/100

Tests and quizzes dominate grades, with but .

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy; online adds proctored or emailed exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person experiences are mixed but still lean negative: a minority find him fair if you attend and , while many call lectures messy and .

Main concern

and unclear lecture structure make success hard without heavy outside help.

What students said

“he is easily the . His lectures are all over the place”
M31LINEARALG

“I love Enriquez. The course is difficult but that's just Calc B. He really cares about his students”
M25B

“my biggest complaint is that the assigned, and the tests.”
MATH25C

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative , and test-centered grading.

Main concern

Students feel abandoned online, with slow or and .

What students said

“Genuinely the . He made everything 10x more difficult than it needed to be.”
25B

“Terrible and completely changed the syllabus”
CALC

“There is litteraly no communication at all. . a mess”
CALCM25A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and are often graded strictly, with online AI proctoring reported in some sections.

Test HeavyTough Partial CreditAI Proctoring OnlinePractice Similar to Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as hard and picky on work format, sometimes matching homework when prepared carefully.

Tough GraderTest HeavyWork Format MattersHomework-Based Exams

“ and if its not done in a certain way)”
CALCM25A

“Don't expect partial credit from him. Give you 0 point on test for not presenting your work in the way that he like, even if your work is correct.”
CALC25B

Online

Online comments report AI-proctored , and .

AI Proctored TestsTimed ExamsEmail SubmissionLittle Feedback

“ and completely changed the syllabus”
CALC

“Gives practically no time at all for tests, most people don't even finish half of it. He .”
CALCM25A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“ . He is awful.”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews with and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Collapse

28/100

“ and a terrible teacher.”

📧 Communication Failure

20/100

“He was way too hard to get ahold of never answers emails and even didn't show up .”

📝

22/100

“He will never give full credit whether you get the right answer or not.”

👍 Minority Praise

70/100

“I love Enriquez... as long as you respect his class he will do anything to make sure you pass and truly understand the material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

His lectures are all over the place, he makes constant mistakes when doing example problems
he usually and expects you to have understood
he teaches us by doing problems with us. For me, it was very effective.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

, but if possible.
.
You only need 1 hour for . Questions are fair

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

Impossible to get ahold of. I emailed him multiple times for test solutions and was always ignored.
Never answers emails.
Not able to get a hold of him and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

239

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and courses show durable, consistent complaints with only a minority of strong defenses.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 535

4 out of 540

3 out of 534

2 out of 540

1 out of 591

Course coverage

CALCM25A6 reviews

CALC25B5 reviews

M153 reviews

M25B3 reviews

MATH053 reviews

Show 20 more courses

MATH25C3 reviews

STATISTICS3 reviews

25B2 reviews

CALC2 reviews

M15STATISTICS2 reviews

MATH25A2 reviews

MATHM25B2 reviews

STATM152 reviews

CALCM25B1 review

COLALMO51 review

M071 review

M31LINEARALG1 review

MATH151 review

MATH707541 review

MATHM071 review

MATHM151 review

MATHM25A1 review

MATHM311 review

MATHMO11 review

STATS1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

A 8 · A- 1

B range

B+ 3 · B 9 · B- 1

C range

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 2

D range

D 1

F

F 1

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 8 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 3

Marcos Enriquez

Avoid unless you already know the material well and can teach yourself; better options exist for most students.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Challenging

Mandatory

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🚫 Recommendation Collapse

📧 Communication Failure

📝 x x x

👍 Minority Praise

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

💬 About Communication

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

📝