AI Rate Professor

English

Yvette de la Vega

ENGM01A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

With only one strongly negative review, treat this as a weak signal and look for other English options if possible.

Best fit · Easy A HunterBusy Work HeavyNot EngagingEasy WorkloadLecture HeavySingle Review Only
  • Only one review exists, so conclusions are fragile
  • The student found the class easy but boring busy work
  • They advise choosing another professor even for required credit

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The only reviewer earned an A and called the workload pretty easy.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Difficulty was rated low and work was described as busy work rather than intellectually hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

The as mandatory.

Based solely on the single in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The and urges students to find a different professor.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

An A with .

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Workload

Light

75/100

Workload is described as pretty easy despite lecture-heavy tags.

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Teaching experience

Poor

20/100

Class is called bad, unengaging, and a waste of time.

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assignments are described as busy work that drive the course experience.

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The sole in-person review calls the class easy busy work that feels like a waste of time and not engaging.

Main concern

Low engagement and easy A path.

What students said

“workload is pretty easy but the class itself feels like a big waste of time and isn't engaging at all.”
ENGM01A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The only review does not clearly describe exams, so .

“most if .”
ENGM01A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“bad class. if you need this class for credit but even then i would find a different professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review only; interpret with extreme caution. Credibility rating: Low.

👎 Overall Experience

15/100

“bad class. if you need this class for credit but even then i would find a different professor.”

📝 Busy Work Focus

30/100

“most if .”

🎯 Easy Workload

75/100

“workload is pretty easy but the class itself feels like a big waste of time and isn't engaging at all.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the class itself feels like a big waste of time and isn't engaging at all.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • workload is pretty easy
  • A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one recent review provides almost no sample size, consistency check, or multi-year span.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGM01A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values