AI Rate Professor

English

Jessica Hasson

ENG1A · ENGLM01A · ENG1 · ENGM01C · MO1C · MO1A · ENGLISHM01A · ENGLIMO1A · M01A · ENGM01A · ENGLISHMO1C · ENGLMO1A · ENG101 · M01C · ENGLM01C · ENG1C · 154 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
73.33%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want an energetic, people-focused English class and and occasional disorganization.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and inspirationalUnconventional interactive styleHarsh on full pointsPACE-friendly workloadCanvas organization issues
  • Warm, funny, and
  • Online and PACE sections often feel lighter, but and
  • Tough on perfect scores yet most finish with A or A- when work is completed

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most reported grades are A or A- with doable essays, though and can feel stingy.

; in-person reviews more often call it an easy A with fair effort.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

and activities, though some online terms pile on weekly papers.

In-person feels easier and more fun; some older online sections reported overwhelming weekly work.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and more expected in person for participation and energy-based activities.

; many in-person reviews mark attendance as mandatory or important.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and care, tempered by organization and harsh-point complaints.

In-person love is stronger and more consistent; online recommendations split between PACE fans and heavy-workload critics.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

You can earn high marks with solid work, but and .

Format shift

; online comments highlight stingy points more often.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Many PACE and later sections feel light with few major essays; some online terms demand heavy weekly writing.

Format shift

Online PACE often lighter; older online and some hybrid sections report drowning in papers.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students widely praise caring, funny, inspirational teaching and interactive classes, with some notes of messiness and .

Format shift

In-person teaching praised more highly; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and participation rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and activities; several students note she does not believe in tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and often life-changing for students who like participation; a minority call her disorganized, late, or light on traditional English content.

Main concern

Expect movement, group work, and participation; pure lecture seekers may struggle.

What students said

“Amazing and caring professor! She sets up her class so you can transform through your own writing.”
ENG1C
“Genuine, funny, inspiring person and so real!”
ENGM01A
“She is such an amazing teacher. .”
ENG1C

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online and PACE sections range from light few-essay setups to heavy weekly paper loads; many praise approachability, others , and .

Main concern

Canvas organization and delayed or .

What students said

“Easy pass, not so easy A, average grade on assignments are between 85-90%”
ENGLISHMO1C
“Super down to earth teacher and from other classes”
ENGLISHMO1C
“The syllabus and course outline were very unorganized in ”
ENGLIMO1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is assignment-heavy with little emphasis on traditional closed-book testing.

Few or no formal examsEssay and project focusedMake-up work allowed when asked

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation; multiple students say there are no tests.

No traditional testsInteractive projectsParticipation matters
“Also she doesn't believe in tests.”
ENGLM01C
“Never had an .”
ENG1C

Online

Online , and projects with late work sometimes accepted.

Essays and discussionsFew graded itemsLate work flexible if communicated
“I was only graded based on a few essays and a .”
ENGLISHMO1C
“Will allow late work if you talk to her.”
ENGLISHMO1C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you attend Moorpark College and in that time, there is something wrong with you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning 2015-2025, balancing glowing in-person praise with online organization and workload concerns. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Caring Personality

85/100

“She is the , as well as, one of the greatest teachers.”

📝 Stingy Perfect Scores

58/100

“She is allergic to giving full points on any assignment no matter how good it is.”

🎭 Unconventional Class Vibes

80/100

“Her teaching methods are anything but ordinary which makes the class fun, her personality is very warm and inviting.”

💻 Online Organization Risk

45/100

“Her modules for . She makes everything a hunt and and due dates clearly.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is full of energy and approachable.
  • Many of our classes were held outside and it was very refreshing.
  • She teaches how to bring writing to life.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy pass, not so easy A
  • The . 100%.
  • easiest english class i've taken ever

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • LOVE HER! She is definitely not an in the box teacher.
  • God bless her. :)
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

154

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across many years, both formats, and mixed tones give a consistent personality-plus-organization picture.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5110
4 out of 517
3 out of 514
2 out of 57
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENGLM01C10 reviews
ENG1C8 reviews
ENGLISHMO1C7 reviews
ENGLIMO1A6 reviews
ENGM01C4 reviews
Show 11 more courses
ENGLISHM01A2 reviews
ENGLM01A2 reviews
ENGLMO1A2 reviews
MO1A2 reviews
ENG11 review
ENG1011 review
ENG1A1 review
ENGM01A1 review
M01A1 review
M01C1 review
MO1C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

37

A+ 4 · A 31 · A- 2

B range

3

B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1