AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Mark Moore

POLYSM03 · POLSCM03 · POLSM01 · POSM03 · POLSM03 · M03 · 69 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
38.71%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you can tolerate disorganization; look elsewhere if you want structured political science teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedLots of papersEasy A possibleConfusing lecturesScattered
  • Many call the class an easy A but learn little due to chaos and .
  • Workload swings from featherlight discussion posts to mountains of papers and packets.
  • Opinion is deeply split between fans of his unconventional style and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many report free or easy As with little learning, though some terms bury students in papers still while giving high grades.

; in person mixed free-A and busywork but still high grades.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Intellectual challenge is usually low, but volume of busywork and .

Online nearly content-free; in .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

and still get A; others say skip class and you will not pass.

Online optional; in person contradictory across semesters.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Take-again near 39% with waves of .

; in person deeply polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

High A rates and , though and sometimes opaque.

Format shift

Both formats easy grades; online extreme late posting of grades.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Some terms almost no work; others dump multiple books, packets, and long papers.

Format shift

Online light discussions; in person swings from light to overwhelming.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Persistent unorganized and and care.

Format shift

Online ghosting and chaos; in person same scatter with occasional fans.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Discussions, papers, packets, and occasional open-note free-response finals dominate over classic exams.

Format shift

Online almost only discussions; in person more papers and bluebook free response.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In person ranges from free-A with and packet loads with .

Main concern

Disorganization, delayed grades, and uneven workload across terms.

What students said

“Definitely super easy class because there was rarely any homework, in class assignments, and .”
POLSM01
“SO MUCH WORK! His lectures are nonexistent and never prepares you for the mountains of you work he assigns you outside of class.”
POLSM03
“very easy class, but also very frustrating. VERY scattered and unorganized”
POLSM03

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online terms felt ghosted and and an easy A but little learning.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“he did not post a .”
POLSM03
“I didn't go to a single lecture or read a single page of the textbook because .”
POLSM03

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

open book free response, or a .

Open notesOpen bookVocab finalFree response bluebooksStudy guides usable on tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In ; some get study guides usable on the test.

Open notesOpen bookVocab finalBluebook free response
“The test and he gives the words on the first day of class.”
POLSM01
“This is an easy class with and that you get to use your notes on.”
POLSM03
“ forms, so prepare for lots of writing. They are all open notes, book, everything though.”
POLSM03

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove formal proctored exams; work was mainly discussion posts.

Discussion postsUnclear final
“he didn't even know if we were going to have a class ended.”
POLSM03
“ .”
POLSM03

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and polarization. Credibility rating: High.

🌀 Disorganization

25/100

“ . Took an online class with him and .”

🆓 Easy A

82/100

“Was defiantly an A so easily achieved that I kept assuming I was missing something.”

📚 Paper Avalanche

20/100

“Assigned so time to even do work for my other classes.”

👍 Minority Praise

70/100

“I personally thought he was one of the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I haven't really learned or gained anything from his lectures
  • Hes a total trip. Even things you didnt think anything of had a lesson
  • His lectures make no sense and are completely irrelevant to the testspapers.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A, , and do the homework
  • You don't need to show up to class to get an A. Honestly this class was a joke.
  • and open book.

Theme 3

📦 About Workload Chaos

  • 4 different textbooks and 3 huge packets of reading
  • He would change the schedule and deadlines almost every week
  • he did not post a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

69

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with repeated organization complaints and easy-A patterns give strong, if polarized, signal.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 513
3 out of 512
2 out of 511
1 out of 517

Course coverage

POLSM0326 reviews
POLSCM039 reviews
M037 reviews
POLSM014 reviews
517781 review
Show 3 more courses
713451 review
POLYSM031 review
POSM031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

29

A+ 5 · A 23 · A- 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 7 · Rather not say 1