AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Claudia Guiterrez

MATHM25A · MATHM03 · MATH77919 · MATH15 · M03 · MATHM10 · MATHM15 · M25A · M05 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
4.35%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

if you have another option; expect , and little support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTest heavyPoor communicationNo curveAvoid
  • .
  • and often mismatch lectures or homework.
  • , and harsh communication are recurring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Almost , and feel out of reach for most.

Both online and and many withdrawals.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Even supposedly easy math courses feel , and busywork.

Consistent high difficulty ratings across formats.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Most comments list attendance as mandatory with lateness and phone penalties in some sections.

A few online or , but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Take-again rate is near zero and .

Only rare older in-person praise; recent online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

; , and accusations or zeros worsen grades.

Format shift

Online sections especially report late grades and sudden weight updates.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of , and match lectures.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy busywork; online also cites sparse guidance.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students call lectures demeaning or unhelpful, say tests do not match class, and report poor communication.

Format shift

A couple of , but they are outliers.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades rely heavily on a you for them.

Format shift

Online MATHM10 reviews say grade .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

unhelpful interactions, and lectures that do not match exams.

Main concern

Tests and ; many report failing or dropping.

What students said

“She falsely accused me of cheating and provided no proof”
MATH15
“M05 is an easy course, but she makes it impossible.”
M05
“I had to spend hours reading an you tubing the chapters to really understand it because she is horrible at explaining.”
MATH15

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students report late , and grades hinging on in-person tests.

Main concern

for online sections.

What students said

“Never graded on time so you never knew where you stood with your grade.”
MATHM10
“Halfway through the semester she corrected and updated the .”
MATHM10
“she is absolutely the worse teacher I have ever had in my ENTIRE life.”
MATHM25A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

than homework, with little curving and occasional notecards.

Test heavyNo curveNotecard sometimes allowedIn-person tests for online classVague test questions

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and often do not match class examples.

Hard testsNotecard front and backNo curveMisaligned with lectures
“She lets you have a notecard front and back on the tests, but the ”
MATHM10
“The examples given in class are nothing like the tests”
M05

Online

Online students and mid-term grading policy changes.

In-person testsLate gradingWeighted policy changes
“the grade relied mostly on 2 in-person tests”
MATHM10
“the entire . 50 questions 100pts each.”
MATH15

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews (8 online, 15 in , and avoid consensus. Credibility rating: High.

🚫

8/100

“she is absolutely the worse teacher I have ever had in my ENTIRE life.”

📝 Test Mismatch

28/100

“the class”

⏳

15/100

“Never graded on time so you never knew where you stood with your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't teach or lecture or help.
  • Her teaching is very elementary style & honestly a demeaning waste of time.
  • and then after getting mad at us for not understanding, she realizes she was doing the wrong thing

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • !!
  • and she acts entitled.
  • over half of my class dropped out due to failing grades.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • can't answer her emails
  • When we tried .
  • ZERO sympathy- loves saying "that's a personal problem"

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-three detailed reviews from 2016-2025 show highly consistent negative themes across online and in-person sections.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 517

Course coverage

MATHM106 reviews
MATH154 reviews
M053 reviews
M25A3 reviews
MATHM033 reviews
Show 4 more courses
M031 review
MATH779191 review
MATHM151 review
MATHM25A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

7

C+ 1 · C 5 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 6 · Not sure yet 4